1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
alexandr1967 [171]
3 years ago
12

PLease help

History
1 answer:
fredd [130]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: The Continental victory at Saratoga in 1777 and the Treaty with the French in 1778 transformed the war, especially for the British. Increased French aid to the Continentals was very slow in coming; coordinated military activity between the two new allies was even slower to happen. Meanwhile, the British were immediately faced with a global conflict with France. As a result, the British changed their strategy yet again in 1778. Rather than mounting a full-scale military campaign against the Continental Army, the British decided to focus their efforts on the loyalists, who they still believed were the majority of the American population.

Believing the loyalists were strongest in the South and hoping to enlist the slaves in their cause--an objective that seems incompatible with a focus on Southern loyalists--the British turned their efforts to the South. In fact, the British had some important military successes in the South. They occupied Savannah, Georgia, in late 1778 and Charleston, South Carolina, in May 1779. They also struck a disastrous blow on General Horatio Gates' forces at Camden, South Carolina, in August 1780.

Although the British were successful in most conventional battles, the fighting in the South, under the leadership of Generals Nathanael Greene and Daniel Morgan, turned toward guerrilla and hit-and-run warfare. Moreover, the British had overestimated loyalist sentiment in the South; their presence actually forced many, who had been sitting out the war, to take sides, most in favor of the Patriots. At the same time, the British underestimated the logistical problems they would encounter, especially when their army was in the interior away from the supplies offered by their fleet. Patriot forces, on the other hand, were supplied and could hide among the local population. As a result, the British southern strategy was a dismal failure.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Which line is highlighted in the middle of the map above?
Karolina [17]
Middle line is the answer
3 0
1 year ago
How did mussolini use the fear of communism to rise in power
omeli [17]

In 1922 October, there were extensive  riots in the rural countryside of Northern Italy and there was widespread fear of a communism takeover during these riots, which  King Victor Emmanuel III of Italy was not happy about.

Mussolini gathered his Fascist followers and foot soldiers known as the "Black shirts" and staged a march on Rome. Once there, King Victor asked him to form a government and restore order in the countryside. Over the next three years, Mussolini dismantled the democracy that prevailed at the time and in 1925 declared himself a dictator of Italy giving himself the title " Duce" which means "The Leader."

5 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP ME ANSWER THIS!!!
exis [7]

Answer:

part of the declaration of independence came from john locke's idea of life liberty and property but Benjamin Franklin changes it to pursuit of happiness in the declaration of indepence

8 0
3 years ago
Why is the February Revolution of 1917 in Russia a private revolution? new product? What is unique about this revolution?
polet [3.4K]

Answer and Explanation:

The February Revolution of Russia 1917 marked the end of autocratic rule in Russia. It was the first of two revolutions in Russia that same year 1917.

In February 23, violent mass protests began in Russia against food rationing and other ills of the monarchy, and it lasted for 8 days. It brought about the end of the monarchial rule of Tsar Nicholas II and began the provisional government under Prince George Lvov.

4 0
3 years ago
Medieval villages grew into towns because of the growth of: 1. exploration 2. trade 3.taxes
solniwko [45]
Medieval villages grew due to a combination of factors including a increase in trade, European geography, enhanced farming technology and population.

So the answer would be 2

Hope this helps <3
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Difference between warriors and soldiers scholarly journal
    14·1 answer
  • What was the biggest challenge in foreign policy facing US presidents in the 1990s? the fall of Soviet communism the rise of uni
    9·2 answers
  • How would the colonists describe the King of England
    6·1 answer
  • What were the directions of social and economic change in the 18th century colonies?
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following was true of the democracy that emerged at the turn of the century?
    9·2 answers
  • How did the ratification debate lead to protections in the Bill of Rights?
    12·1 answer
  • In many aspects, the Revolution was a conflict about defining region and space, clearly de-lineating old and new borders. Identi
    9·1 answer
  • What is the best term to describe the nativists of the early 20th century
    8·1 answer
  • The Panathenaia was held in Athens to
    9·1 answer
  • 14. The father of Italian Renaissance humanism was _______________.​
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!