The Northerners were concerned that the commissioners would think only about the money involved and the slaves would be denied their rights because of this process.
Answer:
FDR was the first, and last, president to win more than two consecutive presidential elections and his exclusive four terms were in part a consequence of timing. His election for a third term took place as the United States remained in the throes of the Great Depression and World War II had just begun. While multiple presidents had sought third terms before, the instability of the times allowed FDR to make a strong case for stability.
Eventually U.S. lawmakers pushed back, arguing that term limits were necessary to keep abuse of power in check. Two years after FDR’s death, Congress passed the 22nd Amendment, limiting presidents to two terms. Then amendment was then ratified in 1951.
At the time of FDR’s third presidential run, however, “There was nothing but precedent standing in his way,” says Perry. “But, still, precedent, especially as it relates to the presidency, can be pretty powerful.”es and you have foreign policy with the outbreak of World War II in 1939,” says Barbara Perry, professor and director of presidential studies at the University of Virginia’s Miller Center. “And then you have his own political viability—he had won the 1936 election with more than two-thirds of the popular vote.
I believe the correct answer is the following one - <span>Yes, since the mistake would be obvious to a reasonable person.
Anyone presiding over this case would see that the store had nothing to do with this, and that it isn't really a huge crime as it was obviously just a mistake. So, the store wouldn't be held liable for a small mistake that one of its employees made.
</span>
<span>Fulgencio Batista is the correct answer</span>
