Answer: Louis XIV and James II aspired to an absolutist system of government.
Explanation:
Similarities: Both rulers advocated absolutism as a system of government. We can define the state in absolutism as a monarchy. It is a system of government created by breaking the links between the Middle Ages and the New Age. The rulers, as proponents of these ideas, sought to put all the institutions of the state under their control. The most obvious example of an absolutist monarchy in Europe is France.
Differences : Unlike the French ruler Louis XIV, who fully implemented his absolutist values, this was not the case with James II. James II in his quest to make England an absolutist monarchy did not find popular support. James II's intentions were contrary to the views of the English Parliament. In the end, coming into conflict with Parliament and even the church (absolutism implied the subjugation of the church), James II would ultimately lose this battle. On the other hand, Louis XIV did not have these problems and until his death, he enjoyed the absolutist model of government.
B. By receiving 10 percent of the vote, it was clear it's antislavery platform had captured Americans attention.
Hey there,
Answer:
Japan wanted to expand its borders and looked for nation to colonize. In 189, Japan convinced Korea to open its ports to trade with Japan. However, China controlled much of Korea's trade. This conflict led to the Sino - Japanese war. Japan emerged victorious in this war. It captured part of Manchuria, which had been under Chinese occupation.
Hope this helps :D
<em>~Top</em>
He was different from the norm- in fact many people described "old hickory" as born from stone- he distinguished himself during 1812 when he defended now orleans (I think). He was about as far as one could get from the aristocratic educated early persidents
Is there any choices??? It might help for me to answer if there are.. :)