Answer:
Electoral polls can be considered as one of the most useful tools that the political class has to press public opinion. However, its inclusion as a tool of democratic government has always aroused, and still continues to raise, widely held opinions. From the beginning, different authors contributed their different perspectives on the advantages and disadvantages of this instrument helping to contribute to the construction of the public image of the electoral polls.
Thus, some scholars pointed out that the results obtained from the representative samples would reveal the benefits that could be obtained from the correct application of the new instrument. They argued that the reliability of the surveys was the fundamental axis of their usefulness and legitimacy, recommending their use as the method more effective to improve a representative government. And they insisted on the importance of knowing and measuring public opinion at shorter intervals than inter-electoral periods. It also defended the scientific status of the surveys with the objective of being able to train them as a response to the government by public opinion and as a new instrument in the service of information.
The election process is every four years on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November. The election is so long because they need the time to win over the states votes and speak up to what they have that’ll help the country. It should be that long because without it, it’s like writing an essay with no valid reason to back up the claim
<span>The state has many different revenue sources.
</span>
Answer:
a) Chimel vs. California
Explanation:
The Chimel vs California case was a result of police officers going to Chimel's home with a warrant that authorized his arrest for burglary. After the warrant was served, the police officers comprehensively searched the house of Chimel. The search revealed various items that were used as exhibit to convict Chimel. The State Courts upheld Chimel's conviction. However the Supreme Court in a 6-2 decision, did not find the search of the full house reasonable, as a search warrant would be needed for this cause.
