1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Effectus [21]
3 years ago
10

What were two arguments for and two arguments against annexation of the Philippines? Which side do you agree with and why?

History
1 answer:
vovikov84 [41]3 years ago
5 0
Americans who advocated annexation evinced a variety of motivations: desire for commercial opportunities in Asia, concern that the Filipinos were incapable of self-rule, and fear that if the United States did not take control of the islands, another power (such as Germany or Japan) might do so.
You might be interested in
This artwork indicates that the authority of European kings was linked to
padilas [110]
B.The Wall of people.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the senates only defense to a fillbuster
Zinaida [17]

A filibuster in the United States Senate is a strategy utilized in the United States Senate in order to keep a measure from being brought to a vote.

<u>Explanation:</u>

The most widely recognized form of delay happens when at least one congresspersons attempts to postpone or hinder a decision on a bill just by expanding banter on it.

In 1917 congresspersons embraced another standard (rule 22) at the asking of President Woodrow Wilson, which enabled the Senate to end a discussion with a 66% greater part vote (utilizing a gadget known as cloture).

3 0
3 years ago
What land did christopher columbus discover
nikklg [1K]

Christopher Columbus discovered America

6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following statements does not describe an effect of Indian removal on the Osage?
goblinko [34]

Answer:

A.

Explanation:

Indian Removal was an act enacted President Andrew Jackson, on May 28, 1830 into the law. According to this act, Native Americans were forced to leave their ancestral lands and move to the western parts of Mississippi river.

It was a forced migraton of Indians by the US government. This act forced the tribes either to accept US newly enforced law or to leave their homes.

<u>The Indian Removal act did not effect Osage as they were not forced out of their lands, </u><u>instead they agreed to renounce their lands in exchange of reserved lands in Oklahoma</u><u>. </u><em><u>This decision ultimately made them the wealthiest Native Americans</u></em><u>.</u>

Thus the correct option is A.

7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What enabled europeans to carve out huge empires an ocean away from their homelands?
Mashutka [201]
The travel of sea by boats
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Where was the Great Zimbabwe? When and why did it begin?
    13·1 answer
  • What was the united states government is based on a bicameral legislature name the two houses of our government?
    7·1 answer
  • How were African Americans in the South hurt by de jure segregation? A. Laws kept African Americans segregated in most areas of
    14·1 answer
  • During the early 1930s, the main goal of the Bonus Army was to pressure the Hoover administration to
    8·1 answer
  • Which explains why some scholars argue that Truman's decision to drop atomic bombs on Japan was unwarranted?
    9·1 answer
  • Which best explains why California’s application for statehood caused a sectional crisis?
    9·2 answers
  • 6. How were the Korean War and the Vietnam War alike? ​(TWO ANSWERS - Must select both and only those two)
    13·1 answer
  • Quick! Match these in the correct order fast! Will mark brainliest and 20 points!
    14·1 answer
  • At the Potsdam Conference, which country did Allied leaders make larger?
    14·2 answers
  • Arachnophobia, the fear of spiders, is an example of a(n)
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!