Answer:
Answer is option A, i.e. systematic sampling.
Explanation:
Systematic sampling is the type of probability sampling method of selection of samples out of the given group of homogenous nature. In this method, every Kth sample is selected until the required amount is obtained. Here, Chrysler selects every 16th van until he is successful in obtaining the 80 vans. Thus, Chrysler is using a systematic sampling method here.
I am 80% sure that the answer is c. (:
Answer: A. An automobile company promotes small family cars and sports utility vehicles to a specific demographic.
Explanation:
Differentiated marketing is a form of marketing that occurs when the advertisement that is done by a particular company appeals to some particular target audiences or segments. Thus is usually done by the company to get ire customers and also enhance the brand awareness.
In this case, the activity that is an example of differentiated marketing will be option A. "An automobile company promotes small family cars and sports utility vehicles to a specific demographic".
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": Cut your expenses by an amount greater than your deficit.
Explanation:
In case there is a deficit in your budget, it means your expenses are higher than your net income. An adjustment must be made in such circumstances. To bring back the balance in your budget, <em>you should cut your expenses by an amount higher than the amount of the deficit</em>. Otherwise, you could increase your income but keeping your expenses at the same level.
Answer:
These are the options for the question:
- Breach of duty.
- Strict liability.
- Recklessness.
- Negligence per se
And this is the correct answer:
Explanation:
Negligence per se consist in act that is neglectful, or unlawful, because it explicitely violates a statue or regulation.
In this case, the statue was the new state law that required smoke detectors to be maintained. The company that installed the smoke detector inside Jose's house clearly did not maintain the detector because otherwise, it would have gone off when the fire started, and Jose probably would not have died.
It is a negligence per se from the smoke detector company, and Jose's wife can lawfully sue them for that very reason.
