Which of the following statements about the inferno is best supported in the text
2 answers:
You might be interested in
<h2>Answer:</h2>
How could the headline best be revised to make it objective?
✔ Valido’s Conduct under Review
How could the first sentence of the article be revised to improve objectivity?
✔ by removing "unpopular" and "conservative"
How could the reporter balance Senator Saud’s comments to make the article more objective?
✔ by adding a comment from a Republican senator
(Photo for proof at the bottom.)
<h2>Explanation:</h2>Objective means non-biased, or free of opinions. Replacing the original headline with "Valido’s Conduct under Review" could be more objective because it does not have bribery in the name. Bribery has a negative connotation and putting it in a title is possibly attacking a person. That is my best guess for this answer, I think the original title is already objective.
Removing "unpopular" and "conservative" improves objectivity because unpopular is an opinionated word that can be used to attack someone. Conservative seems to have a negative connotation in this case, so it could be biased. Reporting information from both sides also improves objectivity, as it shows you're not leaning towards one side.
Here's a photo of Edge just incase.