Answer:
<em>Yes reporters should be denied access to the courtroom.</em>
Explanation:
The reason behind this is that reporters essentially play a role in media. This is because the media uses stories from different sources and reporters are an example of a source. Therefore if a person was to have a private trial the reporter could easily leak out all the information of the trial to the media. Therefore reporters should be denied access to the courtroom due to how they are a source of information the media (<em>for example news papers)</em> uses.
<span>To divide we the people to weaken us, set us against each other with blame games and propaganda. Party loyalty blinders keep us from watching too closely what our own party representatives are doing against our own interests.
Like professional wrestlers they appear to be bitter rivals in public but are the best of friends behind closed doors. They have led us to think that only someone from their parties can win an election. If we vote for a third party candidate we have "thrown our vote away" on someone who stands no chance of winning and let that "evil other party" candidate win. We feel compelled to vote for the "lesser" of the two evils being offered.
Consider this: Both parties of the Senate said that the TARP bill lacked oversight to protect the taxpayer's money (concerning the original 3 page one passed by the House of Representatives). They claimed they were going to add protection and oversight to it. Then behind closed doors they added 137 pages of earmark spending and NO oversight or protection. Bush signed it and they closed the 110 Session of Congress knowing that they had an automatic pay raise in place. Both parties were involved so no evil other party blame games could be played.
Instead they faked outrage when the AIG bonus news came out and blamed the Management for not following rules which they had failed to put into the TARP bill in the first place. Watch this video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6KRXnYgu...</span>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
There are an estimated 1 billion illiterate people in the world. What is the social cost of this level of illiteracy?
According to some studies, the cost of illiteracy in the world is around $1.19 trillion.
Historians and sociologists consider that this is a big issue on the planet. Around the world, there are approximately 800 million people without basic education. Alone in the United States, the cost is estimated to be $300 billion.
Another important indicator is that 43% of Americans that are illiterate, lived in poverty.
A, B, C are all examples of equilibrium. So I would have to decide between D and E. In my opinion I think it is D. Because 'E' seems to represent equality since BOTH Democrats and Republicans apply to this rule.
My final answer D. Hope this helps.
"<span>He believed American colonists should be able to vote in Parliament"
</span>
