1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lemur [1.5K]
3 years ago
7

Why do you think political parties emerged even though most Americans opposed them?

Social Studies
1 answer:
shepuryov [24]3 years ago
4 0
<span>To divide we the people to weaken us, set us against each other with blame games and propaganda. Party loyalty blinders keep us from watching too closely what our own party representatives are doing against our own interests. 
Like professional wrestlers they appear to be bitter rivals in public but are the best of friends behind closed doors. They have led us to think that only someone from their parties can win an election. If we vote for a third party candidate we have "thrown our vote away" on someone who stands no chance of winning and let that "evil other party" candidate win. We feel compelled to vote for the "lesser" of the two evils being offered. 
Consider this: Both parties of the Senate said that the TARP bill lacked oversight to protect the taxpayer's money (concerning the original 3 page one passed by the House of Representatives). They claimed they were going to add protection and oversight to it. Then behind closed doors they added 137 pages of earmark spending and NO oversight or protection. Bush signed it and they closed the 110 Session of Congress knowing that they had an automatic pay raise in place. Both parties were involved so no evil other party blame games could be played. 
Instead they faked outrage when the AIG bonus news came out and blamed the Management for not following rules which they had failed to put into the TARP bill in the first place. Watch this video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6KRXnYgu...</span>
You might be interested in
The rules of experimentation suggest: a. word of mouth is a useless data source b. three experts must agree on a topic before it
PilotLPTM [1.2K]

Answer: A. Word of mouth is a useless data source.

Explanation: Experimentation refers to an empirical procedure or process which is used to validate an hypothesis or establish a fact. However, experimentation requires rules which guides the process, these rules are necessary in other to avoid bias, false conclusions or inference.

According to the options given in the question above, facts used in experimentation should be traceable and reproducible. Word of the mouth is a useless data source as it usually has no empirical basis. Expert opinion or information being established by three or six sources could be considered as a fact.

3 0
3 years ago
Three facts of meridian
lubasha [3.4K]
Hi, would like to help you, but what do you mean? the prime meridan or?
6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is an example of capital substitution?
cupoosta [38]
I'm not sure, but I think is C
3 0
3 years ago
Why are natural resources important to Australia’s economy
butalik [34]

Answer:

Natural resources are important to study, because they're drivers of modern economics. The natural resources of Australia include most famously coal, iron ore, and gold. Metals like iron ore and gold total 28% of Australian exports, but coal isn't far behind at 18%.

Explanation:

HAPPY TO HELP

              --ALASKA

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which group of rats would develop a conditioned taste aversion to saccharin-flavored water?
MaRussiya [10]

The group of rats that would develop a conditioned taste aversion to saccharin-flavored water is "the experimental group initially introduced to saccharin-flavored water."

This is because the experimental group would feel it is the saccharin-flavored water they drank that caused them illness instead of understanding that the radiation could make them ill.

This is based on the findings made by Garcia & Koehling on taste aversion and biological preparedness.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that "the experimental group initially introduced to saccharin-flavored water" is the group of rats that would cultivate a conditioned taste aversion to saccharin-flavored water.

The full question is:

There were two groups of rats: an experimental group initially introduced to saccharin-flavored water and the control group that was not.

Both groups of rats were then exposed to radiation that made them ill. They were exposed to this just once. Then, both groups were given saccharin-flavored water to see if they would avoid it.

Which group of rats would develop a conditioned taste aversion to saccharin-flavored water?

Learn more here: brainly.com/question/21660703

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Amber lives in New York, "the city that never sleeps," so she feels like she has a great deal of freedom and choices. However, s
    12·1 answer
  • If you have a degree in one country can you continue the job in Canada right away
    14·2 answers
  • Why did the US back France during the first Indochina War?
    7·1 answer
  • What are some waterways of Oregon
    11·2 answers
  • The effort needed by all sectors of a society during a conflict is called the Holocaust. total war. rationing. a skirmish.
    14·1 answer
  • Which type of insurgent approach involves a few leaders and a militant cadre or activist party seizing control of government str
    10·1 answer
  • What is a federal budget
    7·2 answers
  • Which of the following was NOT a cause of the frequent movement of Georgia’s capitals from the late 1700s to the mid 1800s?
    10·1 answer
  • What are the provisions in the constitution of nepal regarding women's right and women empowerment​
    5·1 answer
  • WHO IS THE PRESENT PRIME MINISTER OF NEPAL ?​
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!