Well, 1000/5 would be smaller than 2000 not bigger. You are dividing into smaller pieces not multiplying into bigger ones.
Given:

To find the vertical and horizontal asymptotes:
The line x=L is a vertical asymptote of the function f(x) if the limit of the function at this point is infinite.
But, here there is no such point.
Thus, the function f(x) doesn't have a vertical asymptote.
The line y=L is a vertical asymptote of the function f(x) if the limit of the function (either left or right side) at this point is finite.

Thus, y = 0 is the horizontal asymptote for the given function.
Answer:
9 feet
Step-by-step explanation:
The height of the ball in feet is given by the polynomial:

where t is the time in seconds.
After 3 seconds, t = 3:

The height of the ball after 3 seconds is 9 feet.
Answer:
See Explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
a) Additive inverse of −2
- the additive inverse of a number a is the number that, when added to 'a', yields zero. This number is also known as the opposite (number), sign change, and negation.
- So the Additive inverse of -2 is 2. ∴ -2+2=0
b) Additive identity of −5
- Additive identity is the value when added to a number, results in the original number. When we add 0 to any real number, we get the same real number.
- -5 + 0 = -5. Therefore, 0 is the additive identity of any real number.
c) additive inverse of 3
- Two numbers are additive inverses if they add to give a sum of zero. 3 and -3 are additive inverses since 3 + (-3) = 0. -3 is the additive inverse of 3.
d). multiplicative identity of 19
- an identity element (such as 1 in the group of rational numbers without 0) that in a given mathematical system leaves unchanged any element by which it is multiplied
- Multiplicative identity if 19 is 1 only, since 19 x 1 = 19.
e) multiplicative inverse of 7
- Dividing by a number is equivalent to multiplying by the reciprocal of the number. Thus, 7 ÷7=7 × 1⁄7 =1. Here, 1⁄7 is called the multiplicative inverse of 7.
d) | 11-5|×|1-5|
- | 11-5|×|1-5| ⇒ I6I×I-4I ⇒ 6×4 ⇒ 24
Answer:
Yes, △ABC ∼ △FED by AA postulate.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given:
Two triangles ABC and FED.
m∠A = m∠B
m∠C = m∠A + 30°
m∠E = m∠F = 
m∠D =
°.
Now, let m∠A = m∠B = 
So, m∠C = m∠A + 30° = 
Now, sum of all interior angles of a triangle is 180°. Therefore,
m∠A + m∠B + m∠C = 180

Therefore, m∠A = 50°, m∠B = 50° and m∠C = m∠A + 30° = 50 + 30 = 80°.
Now, consider triangle FED,
m∠D+ m∠E + m∠F = 180

Therefore, m∠F = 50°
m∠E = 50° and
m∠D = 
So, both the triangles have congruent corresponding angle measures.
m∠A = m∠F = 50°
m∠B = m∠E = 50°
m∠C = m∠D = 80°
Therefore, the two triangles are similar by AA postulate.