Answer:
Correlation does not mean <em>causation</em> even after having a relatively high correlation coefficient as a result.
Step-by-step explanation:
Correlation and causation are not the same. Correlation does not mean that variations in one variable <em>cause</em> variations in the second variable. Instead, correlation considers that variations in one variable <em>corresponds</em> with variations of the second variable. No more.
Correlation is an important first step to establish that one variable possibly can cause some effect on the other, but it is not a definitive answer to this question. It is crucial to find other possible factors that can explain what causes some effect.
As a conclusion, a positive and relative high correlation coefficient does not necessarily mean causation. It simply tells us that some study found that people that listen to loud music are also people with poor hearing problems, and possibly a cause to the latter variable is to listen loud music repeatedly, but it is a must to find other possible factors before definitely concluding that.
They are asking for the y coordinate of the g I guess
If that is the case, the answer is 1
Answer:
8% tax rate.
Step-by-step explanation:
The 8% (0.08) is the tax rate because the 100%, or 1.00, is the original price of the racket, which was $13.
The answer is 9/23 you simply both sides of the equation, subtract 7x from both sides, divide both sides by -23
9514 1404 393
Answer:
x = 1, x = 7
Step-by-step explanation:
You can see from the graph that the x-intercepts of f(x) are ...
0 = f(-3)
0 = f(3)
To find the corresponding values of x for f(x-4), we can solve ...
0 = f(x -4)
x -4 = -3 ⇒ x = 1
x -4 = 3 ⇒ x = 7
The x-intercepts of the function after translation 4 units right are ...
x = 1, x = 7
__
Your sketch will be the same curve moved 4 units to the right. (Add 4 to every x-value shown.)
