Answer: Whether or not to permit slavery.
Context/details:
The Kansas-Nebraska Act enacted by Congress in 1854. It granted popular sovereignty to the people in the Kansas and Nebraska territories, letting them decide whether they'd allow slavery. In essence, this made the Kansas-Nebraska act a repeal of the Missouri Compromise of 1820, which had said there would be no slavery north of latitude 36°30´ except for Missouri.
After the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act, pro-slavery and anti-slavery settlers rushed into Kansas to try to sway the outcome of the issue, and violence between the two sides occurred. The term "bleeding Kansas" was used because of the bloodshed.
The Three-Fifths Compromise. The Three-Fifths Compromise was a compromise by the Founding Fathers between the Northern and Southern states. It was related to how the population of slaves in a state would be counted towards the state's taxation and representation in Congress.
Judical Reform bill was brought in a bid to let the bill regarding trade New Deal of 1937 pass and it has been seen unfavorably by critics.
Explanation:
Franklin Roosevelt was looking to open up the trade of the country with the other parts of the world after a long decade of isolation after the Great Depression but the manner in which this was approached in the New Deal was deemed unconstitutional by the court of justice.
When this happened, Roosevelt instead doubles down and looked to curb the power of the court by taking away from them the power to make laws constitutional or not.
This sparked debate and many critics have called this move self centered and self serving.
