Answer: Most officials, across local, state, and federal levels.
Explanation: I got it wrong and it said that was the correct answer.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Supreme Court Justice Holmes once included this statement in a majority opinion: "During wartime, utterances tolerable in peacetime can be punished." This statement informed the Supreme Court's later decisions on freedom of speech in that in times of war, citizens are not allowed to express comments or critics that could compromise the national security of the country. So in this case, freedom of speech could be suppressed during the time of war.
In the past, there had been incidents that could have compromised the strategy of the war due to some espionage activities. That is why the federal government has to be cautious with the information that is shared during war times.
Answer:
In an office, every employee has an absolute and comparative advantage depending on the type of work he/she is best at.
In Hector's office, the employee Sasha worked as a computer designer and was excellent in her work. This means that the employee Sasha had an absolute and comparative advantage as she was efficient in her work and hence, there was no opportunity cost of her side of work.
The employee, Maurice was best in logo designing. Hence, he had a absolute and comparative advantage as he was good in logo designing and their was no other opportunity cost for his work.
Answer:
Option C
Explanation:
According to the case given in the question, the competitive force as seen from the Porter's Five Forces Industry Analysis Structure, is the Supplier's bargaining force.
This competitive force in the industry is the perfect representation of the haggling intensity of purchasers and alludes to the weight providers can put on organizations by raising their costs, bringing down their quality, or lessening the accessibility of their items.
The first one is the correct answer.
