Answer: they changed the law back when they made the prison asylum reform
Explanation:
Explanation:
ROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION
Sections
HomePolitics, Law & GovernmentPolitics & Political Systems
Proportional representation
politics
Cite Share More
WRITTEN BY
The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica
Encyclopaedia Britannica's editors oversee subject areas in which they have extensive knowledge, whether from years of experience gained by working on that content or via study for an advanced degree....
See Article History
Proportional representation, electoral system that seeks to create a representative body that reflects the overall distribution of public support for each political party. Where majority or plurality systems effectively reward strong parties and penalize weak ones by providing the representation of a whole constituency to a single candidate who may have received fewer than half of the votes cast (as is the case, for example, in the United States), proportional representation ensures minority groups a measure of representation proportionate to their electoral support. Systems of proportional representation have been adopted in many countries, including Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Greece, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Luxembourg, Norway, Russia, Spain, Sweden, and Switzerland.


Answer:
Explanation:
Illinois (1963) involved what legal right?
the right to have a lawyer present during police interrogation
the right to remain silent while being arrested by police
the right to expunge criminal convictions from the record after winning an appeal
the right to investigate a crime for which the defendant has been accused
Answer: nothing; because Sam is an independent contractor.
Explanation:
Under the law of agency, an agency is created when an authority is delegated from one individual to another individual whereby such person is appointed to do a particular job.
Based on the information given, Joe is not liable liable to the passer-by because Sam is an independent contractor as he was contracted to Casey out a task. If he was an employee of Joe, then he will be liable.
