No according to me the parole system should not be abolished but it should be more strict and done in more specific platforms cases.
Explanation:
According to my opinion, the parole should not be abolished but it should be categorized for some specific cases. The court system needs to define or create a category in which some specific or certain cases fall.
On the basis of nature of case, the court need to grant parole such as in theft cases while in cases like murder, attempt to murder, kidnapping which are more dangerous in nature, should not grant parole.
Thus specification is a required amendment rather than abolishing.
Answer:
In fact, Bentham would first take into account the consequences of all acts to determine whether each action induces pleasure or suffering, while Kant would consider perform the act & decide whether this action is moral "right" or "wrong." The theory of Bentham only recognises the best possible happiness induced.
Explanation:
Answer: The Democratic Republic of Vietnam was established following the August Revolution of 1945. A new legal system was gradually formed alongside the government in order to strengthen the government and social management. The reality of the legal system is secured and brought into play on this basis.
Explanation: Hope that helps
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Declarations against interest are an exception to the rule on hearsay in which a person's statement may be used, where generally the content of the statement is so prejudicial to the person making it that he would not have made the statement unless he believed the statement was true.
And statements are usually made in court.
Statement Offered Against a Party That Wrongfully Caused the Declarant’s Unavailability. A statement offered against a party that wrongfully caused — or acquiesced in wrongfully causing — the declarant’s unavailability as a witness, and did so intending that result.
is exempted from testifying about the subject matter of the declarant’s statement because of the court rules
