The best answer here is D. Each type of broadcast is going to offer something different. While hearing a radio broadcast might seem to not convey the depth of the disaster, a video one will show how terrible it is. Usually this will make the audience more aware of the reality. The same is true to a transcript. Going back to read something that has already happened takes something from the presentation. You don't get the emotion that would be present in a radio broadcast or even a video one.
I would go with the second option; i am a very loyal and honorable man unless the context states otherwise
Answer:
Freneau, at first, seems to be holding a Christian, European burial ritual in superior view to those of the Native Americans. One sees quickly that he does not feel this way, as he suggests that the European formality of burying their dead lying down puts their loved one to rest not only in life, but in all forms. The Native Americans in contrast set their deceased loved ones sitting up, surrounded by implements of life for a journey into an active afterlife. In particular, he mentions an arrowhead as a head of stone (or bone). So Native Americans' "headstones" are arrows, tools of action, and Europeans' headstones are true headstones, heavy objects lying over the deceased. Freneau then showed preference for the mysticism of Native American death over the somber, cold, final, and boring death of the Christian European.
Explanation:
Answer: B
Explanation: I might be wrong so sorry if I am.
Answer: The writer compare and contrast how the theme are developed
Explanation:
