I think it varies. the big bang theory seems to be a widely accepted theory about how the universe began. but then again, how did the little things that the universe originated from come into existence? anyways, the big bang theory hasn't been proven... so it's up for discovery i guess
For centuries scientists thought the Universe always existed in a largely unchanged form, run like clockwork thanks to the laws of physics. But a Belgian priest and scientist called George Lemaitre put forward another idea. In 1927, he proposed that the Universe began as a large, pregnant and primeval atom, exploding and sending out the smaller atoms that we see today.
His idea went largely unnoticed. But in 1929 astronomer Edwin Hubble discovered that the Universe isn’t static but is in fact expanding. If so, some scientists reasoned that if you rewound the Universe's life then at some point it should have existed as a tiny, dense point. Critics dismissed this: the celebrated astronomer Fred Hoyle sarcastically called this concept the “Big Bang Theory"
Either B) increased parasympathetic stimulation of the heart. OR D) Constriction of elastic arteries to maintain blood pressure. I'm leaning more towards D) constriction of elastic arteries to maintain blood pressure.
