Answer:
1/ Nam said his uncle often planted the vegetables in the afternoon.
2/ She said her uncle would not plant the vegetables the following day afternoon
3/ He asked me if my uncle planted the coffee trees in the field the previous years .
4/ Nga said Mr and Mrs Pike had just read these newspapers
5/ Lan asked Minh if his sister took the vegetables to market everyday
6/ She said her often listened to music at night
7/The teacher asked me if they had written the answers in the exercise books
8/Lan's mother said her daighter usually brushed her teeth before meals
9/ Nga asked Nam his father watched Joo Mong film the previous night, Nam ?
10/ They said us had to do the assignments then.
11/Lan said her sister seldom rode a bike to school.
12/ She said that students at secondary school and high school rarely sang English songs
13/ Ngan told Mai not to feed the chickens."
14/ They said their teacher sometimes explained the difficult lesson
15/ My teacher of Geography said the Earth moves around the sun
16/ Nam said he was doing his homework then
17/ He asked if i could meet him after class
18/ Our teacher told not to talk in class
19/ The policeman asked me to show him my driving licence
20/ The man told me not to touch this button or you'II get an electric shock
Explanation:
The jury returned a guilty verdict on July 14, 1921. Each of the defendants was found guilty of first-degree murder. The weight of evidence—the weapons, ballistic tests, and eyewitness testimony—and the issue of consciousness of guilt were crucial in convicting Sacco and Vanzetti, but emotional factors were also heavily present.
***The presiding judge, a man who had requested to work on the trial because he hated anarchists, influenced the jury against the suspects with his instructions about the guilty behavior of the men.***
The prosecutor emphasized the Italian background of Sacco and Vanzetti.
A six-year struggle to save Sacco and Vanzetti followed the trial. Countless observers worldwide were convinced that political intolerance and racial bigotry had condemned two men whose only offense was that of being foreigners, atheists, and anarchists. Sacco and Vanzetti defenders eventually included radicals, trade unionists, intellectuals, liberals, and even some conservatives. Others were steadfast in their belief that the American system of justice could do no wrong and that the two subversives were guilty as charged, had been fairly tried, and deserved the maximum penalty.
The fate of Sacco and Vanzetti, however, was not decided in the arena of public opinion. Eight motions for a new trial in accordance with Massachusetts law were submitted to the trial judge. Several pertained to perjured testimony by prosecution witnesses and to collusion between local police and Justice Department agents. Another addressed a jailhouse confession by a convicted bank robber, Celestino Madieros, who claimed he and other members of the Morelli gang of professional criminals had committed the South Braintree holdup and murders. Each motion was denied. After the Massachusetts Supreme Court ruled that no errors of law or abuses of discretion had been committed, the judge sentenced Sacco and Vanzetti to death on April, 9, 1927.
In the face of mounting criticism of the legal proceedings and the impending death sentence, Massachusetts Governor Alvan T. Fuller appointed a committee on June 1, 1927 to review the case and advise him on the issue of clemency. The Lowell committee, named after its chair, Harvard University President A. Lawrence Lowell, ignored exculpatory evidence the defense had discovered since the trial while validating the prosecution's every step. Reporting its findings to Governor Fuller on July 27, the Lowell Committee declared that the trial and appeals process had been fair and advised against clemency. Governor Fuller followed the committee's recommendation. Despite continuing worldwide protests and demonstrations, Sacco and Vanzetti were electrocuted at Charlestown State Prison on August 23, 1927.
Answer:
The fall of the empire did fall. The fall of the Roman Empire was caused when there was less loyalty to Rome. The Urban Centers start to collapse. Also the military, political, and Social of Rome was causing Rome to collapse. Another reason of why the Roman Rome collapsed is when the aqueducts were destroyed and some of the public works. Rome is like if one thing falls apart the whole thing falls apart. The aqueduct made Rome collapse because the people of Rome needed water in and out so, when it collapse the population just literally dropped from like a million to a couple of hundred of the people and then the people of Rome just scattered to different areas to have a better life or to move where there is water or good harvests. The metaphor I think of it of Rome falling apart is when there is a grand sand castle, mighty, powerful, and wealthy. But, then the tides get high and wash it away. This is a reference to Rome because Rome was amazing with public works like coliseums, and the beauty, of Rome was demolished, gone, population drops because the ego, the life, the wealth is gone, and that is what I think of it.
Explanation:
