The author wants the reader to feel empathy, or at least understand him. He says: “You, who so well know the nature of my soul, will not suppose, however, that I gave utterance to a threat.” <span>The author talks extremely negative towards Fortunato. This suggests he is trying to persuade us to feel the same way. When he says that he did him wrong it clearly shows how evil his plan is. So the reader throughout the story actually believes that Fortunato is bad. It's only until we get to the vault scene that you realize maybe Montressor is just psychotic</span>
Answer:
Use an appropriate level of formality.
Explanation:
Reagan claimed that the in the future, the space program would be not only much safer, but also a source of pride despite all the mishaps from Challenger.
His claimed is absolutely credible and supported by logical, since the empiric evidence shows us that sacrifices and adversities are romanticized throughout history. Not only that, explorers and inventors tend to be exalted in future generations. Columbus is still talked about and so will be Neil Armstrong for stepping on the moon.
In addition to that, it is noted that technology evolves faster every year and safety goes along with it. Cars, for example, are much safer with better break technology and airbags, for example. Space exploration, even though it is still being perfected, is so much safer today than it was when it all started and will be much safer in the future.
The last one: one study placed the monetary of value of pollinating the world's main food crops at over $200 billion in 2005
I read this a few years ago! In Massachusetts, no GIRL could swim. Katherine is from Barbados, a tropical place, so she could swim well. After she jumped in to save a doll, she swam and got it out. This was normal behavior in Barbados, and not Massachusetts. Furthermore, her talking to Hannah does not prove she is a witch. She wants to help her.
