Based on the given options, the most likely is answer is "Students’ language is a reflection of what they read."
The text reflects on the reading material and how it affects language and writing style of students. Thank you for your question. Please don't hesitate to ask in Brainly your queries.
Answer:
Explanation:
The musical or the book?
I don't see much of him no matter what basis you use -- book or musical. Do you?
He flourished in a time when knights were bound by a code of honor and the results were not good if you broke that code of honor. He had no intention of doing anything that was wrong. He was so high minded that Sancho Panza had to keep on reminding himself that the Don was either a great saint or an unholy fool and throughout the entire production of both he never really made up his mind. Don Quixote was far too remote, far too idealistic, far too much of a man seeking the world not as it was, but as he wanted it to be. Sancho could never bring himself to see the world that way. And yet, he stuck with him. If his understanding did not increase, his wonder did. The more he saw, the less he really knew, but that was only part of it. Every person must make up their own mind about Sancho. I've spent so much time on him because he is more like modern man. The difference is that he hung around to see if he could come to some understanding of the Don.
Dulcinia is a different person that both of them, but she sees more clearly who Don Quixote is and she tries to push him away but she's not fully successful. I'm a guy and in general, I like that kind of woman. She tried to see him through a different set of lenses. His code prevented him from doing anything about it. We modern people would show no such hesitancy. Dulcinia may give us what we want but she respects the Don. She will never forget him whereas in a year's time, she could not remember anything about the rest of us.
Answer:
Lincoln arguments at Gettysburg cemetery address where based on the fact that the life of those who lost their lives during the civil war must be remembered by creating a monument for them so as to remember them and be known that their death which has bought freedom as a form of sacrifice to their country.
Explanation:
President Abraham Lincoln was at National Cemetery in Gettysburg in Pennysylvania in 1863 which was the area where the Civil War battle was decided. It was the spot where the Union and the Conservatives lost their soldiers during the Civil War.
However, in his argument, President Lincoln made the following argument in support of the Northern civilians:
- He suggested that the falling heroes can be remembered only when civilians build memorials for the dead.
- Lincoln argued that the dead can be happy by civilians helping their families to survive.
- He argued that the civilian can give the dead happiness by helping and putting more effort towards the goals they died for.
- He argued that the civilians joining the army will and always give them victory.
- He argued that monetary contribution by the civilian can make them win the war.
- He also argued that the life of dead ones has brought about freedom in the land and that democracy which is the government of the people, by the people and for the people shall not perish.
Answer:
The conclusion of a narrative reflects on (drum roll please): B. the experience over the course of narrative.
By the time the reader gets done reading the last paragraph of the narrative they can reflect on the experience over the course of narrative.
therefore your answer is B.
Pretty sure it's B
Hope it is:)
