Cai tried to prove that \triangle FGH\cong \triangle HIJ△FGH≅△HIJtriangle, F, G, H, \cong, triangle, H, I, J. Statement Reason 1
FG=HI=6FG=HI=6F, G, equals, H, I, equals, 6 Given 2 FH=HJ=4FH=HJ=4F, H, equals, H, J, equals, 4 Given 3 \overline{FG} \parallel \overline{HI} FG ∥ HI start overline, F, G, end overline, \parallel, start overline, H, I, end overline Given 4 \angle HFG\cong\angle JHI∠HFG≅∠JHIangle, H, F, G, \cong, angle, J, H, I When a transversal crosses parallel lines, alternate interior angles are congruent. 5 \triangle FGH\cong \triangle HIJ△FGH≅△HIJtriangle, F, G, H, \cong, triangle, H, I, J Side-angle-side congruence What is the first error Cai made in his proof? Choose 1 answer: Choose 1 answer: (Choice A) A Cai used an invalid reason to justify the congruence of a pair of sides or angles. (Choice B) B Cai only established some of the necessary conditions for a congruence criterion. (Choice C) C Cai established all necessary conditions, but then used an inappropriate congruence criterion. (Choice D) D Cai used a criterion that does not guarantee congruence.