The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although you did not provide any context, excerpt, text, link to an article or video, we can answer in general terms.
It seems that your question refers to a documentary where specialists talk about the problems and risks of overpopulated Asian_American neighborhoods in Northern California and Seattle, Washinton. If that is the case, then we can comment on the following.
What affluent neighborhoods take for granted that promotes better health that is often lacking in disadvantaged neighborhoods is the fact that the people who live in affluent villages or neighborhoods have the advantage of having better infrastructure and environmental help to maintain good health conditions. This means a better trash collection system, better medical infrastructure such as hospitals, emergence service, more governmental supervision on the streets, and more.
Less favored neighborhoods lack infrastructure or policies that affect people's lives. In these neighborhoods, people live in overcrowded spaces with no ventilation and disease could spread more easily among the inhabitants.
Answer:
the hindsight bias
Explanation:
Hindsight bias
This is simply known as the probability/tendency to believe after getting you know or learned all outcome, that one would have known or seen it as "I knew it all along".
Overconfidence together with hindsight bias, can cause intuition overestimation.
It is also the ability to believe(know) after learning an outcome, that one would have known it before.
Answer:
However, many consider a significant starting point to slavery in America to be 1619, when the privateer The White Lion brought 20 African slaves ashore in the British colony of Jamestown, Virginia. The crew had seized the Africans from the Portugese slave ship Sao Jao Bautista.
Explanation:
Answer:
see below
Explanation:
1, most people weren't as knowledgeable back then and FDR wanted to present the plan in terms they would understand and not be overwhelmed by. 2, this one is supposed to be your opinion buuuut: either yes it did make participation inevitable because the opposing nations saw the US gearing up for war and saw that as defensive as opposed to neutral. or no it did not because the US never directly violated the offical postion of neutrality. (hope this helped! good luck!)
