Because listen to a speech can not only be hard to keep up with. It is someone trying to convince you and teach you about there idea. But with writing an essay your writing your own creativity. Your creative juices are being printed without anyone listening.
In the first text, Zimbardo argues that people are neither "good" or "bad." Zimbardo's main claim is that the line between good and evil is movable, and that anyone can cross over under the right circumstances. He tells us that:
"That line between good and evil is permeable. Any of us can move across it....I argue that we all have the capacity for love and evil--to be Mother Theresa, to be Hitler or Saddam Hussein. It's the situation that brings that out."
Zimbardo argues that people can move across this line due to phenomena such as deindividualization, anonymity of place, dehumanization, role-playing and social modeling, moral disengagement and group conformity.
On the other hand, Nietzsche in "Morality as Anti-Nature" also argues that all men are capable of good and evil, and that evil is therefore a "natural" part of people. However, his opinion is different from Zimbardo in the sense that Nietzsche believes that judging people as "good" and "bad" is pointless because morality is anti-natural, and we have no good reason to believe that our behaviour should be modified to fit these precepts.
Answer:
There once was a lass who liked mushrooms.
Bla bla bla bla bla bla bla plush rooms
It was rather sliced,
But not very zeitgeist,
She couldn't say no to the plush rooms.
Explanation:
hope this helps :)
if not I can always make another one ;)
Earnest Hemingway said "All modern american literature comes from ane book by mark twain called Huckleberry Finn" in 1935
