1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
svp [43]
3 years ago
13

A federal judge who interprets the constitution literally is considered to be a

History
1 answer:
tia_tia [17]3 years ago
5 0
The correct answer is originalist. These are judges who interpret the constitution based on their understanding of what the founding fathers meant and wanted with it. Opposite would be a pragmatist, a person who understands that the constitution changes due to the spirit of the age changing.
<span />
You might be interested in
Please help with this
Lisa [10]

Answer:

Build a powerful militiary in Europe

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
“Immigration is like tucking your roots Into yourself”
stepladder [879]

Answer:

Well, you aren't tasting, smelling, or hearing anything. seeing is a possibility, but I feel like it's using "touch".

The author sees immigrants as carrying their roots with them. This would lend to the further idea of replanting in a different location to grow and spread, perhaps healthier than before.

8 0
3 years ago
After the american revolution france was left​.....?<br>debt free<br>in turmoil<br>without a leader
Keith_Richards [23]

Answer:

...in turmoil.

Explanation:

After the American Revolution, the French also believed that it was time for them to reconstruct their government. Their government under the leadership of Louis XVI & Marie Antoinette did not work well, as they proved to be ineffective in helping the people, as well as spending large amounts of money on their own pleasures. This led to the overthrow of the Monarchy as well as the Reign of Terror, that ended with the coup d'tat led by the popular Napoleon Bonaparte & the rise of the French Empire.

~

6 0
3 years ago
What best Describes the Great Compromise? * A decision that most favored the larger states A decision that most favored the smal
Sonbull [250]

Answer:

The Connecticut Compromise (also known as the Great Compromise of 1787 or Sherman Compromise) was an agreement that large and small states reached during the Constitutional Convention of 1787 that in part defined the legislative structure and representation that each state would have under the United States

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
3. Why does Theodora believe that flight is not the right choice?
Ede4ka [16]

Theodora believes that giving up their reputation as nobility and becoming fugitives would be almost impossible for them, and she says she would rather face death because death is already going to happen.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the<br> language the<br> Romans used?
    13·2 answers
  • Which of the following powers of the national government is an inherent power?
    10·1 answer
  • World War II events occurred in 1945?
    15·1 answer
  • Who would say something like “There is more than one side to the story”?
    5·1 answer
  • The Peace of Augsburg was later broken by the Council of Trent. the Thirty Years’ War. the Great Peasants’ Revolt. the Protestan
    9·2 answers
  • Explain how Germany, Italy and Japan became allies in World War II.<br> Your answer
    6·1 answer
  • How did Andrew Jackson represent what Alexis de Tocqueville recognized as the American character?
    7·2 answers
  • The Louisiana Purchase raised a serious question about the meaning of the Constitution. Do you think it was a good thing to inte
    6·1 answer
  • Why were the janissaries important in the Ottoman Empire?
    5·1 answer
  • Who did the U.S. initially support in the war - Vietnamese or the French? Why?<br> -
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!