Answer: Feudalism as a fundamental socio-economic relationship of the Middle Ages.
Explanation:
Feudalism implied a hierarchy in which all social classes were included, and it functioned for centuries during the Middle Ages. At the top of the "feudal pyramid" was a king who allocated land to nobles or feudal lords, on that land worked serfs who took part of the income from the land for themselves, and in case of war, the feudal lord, in turn, had to assign a certain number of soldiers. Was a larger feudal lord had to provide a larger number of majors). The disappearance of the feudal system occurred with the emergence of the first economic relations, i.e., the emergence of private property; the king no longer had to allocate land to have an army but could hire and pay from the state treasury. Fundamental changes in economic relations that are still relevant today occurred during the XIX. century. Namely, this is the Industrial Revolution period when large capitalists appear, who pay taxes to the state for their activities, and economic relations are still in force today.
The role of the Supreme court is to interpret the constitution. If you need more clarification, i will be happy to elaborate.
<span>The human brain does not fully develop until age 25. A person's emotional maturity, self-image, and judgement are affected as these traits are linked to development of the prefrontal cortex. As a result, adolescents require guidance until reaching maturity.</span>
Answer: It had a History of Protecting Slavery and Segregation – This is often cited as one of the main detriments of the system of federalism that we have in this country, that since slavery was a state issue, it was something that could not be removed on the national level.
It Allows for Inequalities Between Different States – For example, instead of education funding throughout the country being the same, since it is a state issue, some states will spend more, per capita, on education than other states, causing what could be considered a disparity. The same goes for other things, as well, such as taxes, health care programs, and welfare programs.
The Blockage of Nationalist Policies by States – States can fight against the existence of certain national laws by challenging them in court, or going out of their way to not enforce those national laws, or even deliberately obstructing enforcement of national laws.
Racing to the Bottom – One argument given is that states will compete with each other in an oppositional way, by reducing the amount of benefits they give to welfare recipients compared to, say, a neighboring state, motivating the undesirables to go to the neighboring state, thereby reducing their welfare costs even more. This reduction of state benefits to needy has been deemed the ‘race to the bottom.’
