Answer: Q. 1-5. The material for the jacket was an attractive plaid. Kathleen had cut out a new pair of slacks. Marianne was working on the jacket. They stopped for a cold drink before finishing the job. 2. Plans for the party are still indefinite. The girls had left early. They arrived home too late for dinner.
Q. 6-12 Milk that is sour can be used for cooking = simple
2. Early this morning the ambulance sped down the street = compound
3. George refused the other position after he received a raise in salary= compound
4. The train, which was delayed by a blizzard, was an hour late= compound
5. The cost of this perfume is high, but the price includes the tariff= compound
6. The Valley of Ten Thousand Smokes was formed by an eruption of Mount Katmai, Alaska = compound
7. The United States Naval Academy is located at Annapolis, and the United States Military Academy is located at West Point = compound
Explanation:
Answer: The answer is you can neither be fully supportive of the either. In fact the battle will go on or you may the arguments will perhaps get louder in the years to come.
Explanation: None of the nations wants to back from using a lucrative resources that they chance upon fully knowing the repercussions of climate change and various other damaging havoc that can impact the entire earth.
The greed in humans cannot be killed and perhaps we already are paying a heavy price for it. The conservationists believe the usage of the resources should be done in a responsible manner.
The supply need not be jeopardised for the future generations but no objections in continuing to use them though. Sustainability is the argument that they propound.
The preservationists are purists in the true sense they don't want to disturb mother nature and allow them to flourish in their pristine form and we continue to live in harmony with that.
The intrinsic value of the land and other resources have to retained and gained inspiration for its beauty and serenity. It is the theory that preservationists have stuck too for years.
Each is right in their own way, if we don't use the natural resources we won't be able to function as well as we do.
If we don't preserve some of the natural resources and stick our head into every resource on the surface of the earth, there will be large destruction and extinction of flora and fauna.
Hence it would be right to say, that we need to rethink what we are going to do because in the next few years what we do will determine our future and there is no going back then.
Your answer should be Paul the Apostle. Although, Moses wrote many books of the Bible as well.
Huh? What does this mean? Me confused I don’t quite understand and grasp it
