Answer:the second one
Explanation:
This reasoning is a fallacy of relevance: it fails to address the proposition in question by misrepresenting the opposing position. For example: Quoting an opponent's words out of context—i.e., choosing quotations that misrepresent the opponent's intentions (see fallacy of quoting out of context).
this is what it is and now all you have to do is figure out which it is
Answer:
Fact
Explanation:
History is fact, it's apart of the past, something that has already happened.
1: description
2: problem / solution
3: time / order chronological
4: comparison / contrast
5: cause / effect
Answer:
In my opinion, the answer would be 2. The players who were working at the carwash impressed the customers with their hard work.
Explanation:
I think this would be the answer because a relative clause gives more information about the noun, in this case the players, in the sentence. In addition, a relative clause begins with either who, which, that, and whose, these are called relative pronouns or where, why, when, these are called relative adverbs.
The players= the noun
who= the relative clause