There is extraneous information in the diagram. There is duplicate information where you have... There are rivers flowing beneath our feet... a myth? Can stay because it’s simplified. The information ...Have you ever heard that there are rivers of water flowing underground? Do you think it’s true? should be deleted because it’s duplicating the simplified statement prior. Also, Some rivers, such as the Alpaha River in northern Florida, USA,can disappear underground during low flow periods isn’t relevant to the rest of the diagram. Generally water underground is more like water in a sponge is inaccurate and should be deleted. It states in the diagram later on that the water underground is a filler between the rock particles and soil. I hope this helped you. Sorry I didn’t see it sooner.
D because if you read this carefully you need to see how it feels to you
Curators identifies high quality useful data on the graph
We have no choice but to assume one is of an obscure and esoteric style, or if one is a simple function with some useful properties, such as the value of the operator in the function's value, and only one entry in the list, why should we give it no value?
CORRECT ME IF IM WRONG
HOPE IT HELPS:)
The final draft. It's the stage where you want to fix minor details before turning it in, correcting the small stuff like grammar and spelling and punctuation.
