C) Put sentence 2 before sentence 1.
This would be the best option because sentence 2 introduces the tea and the earl. Sentence 1 refers to the earl when it says, "how the earl". Since the specific earl is not named in this sentence, we know that the earl should be named earlier in the passage. Also, sentence number 1 introduces the idea of various legends. Sentence 3 introduces ones of those legends; therefore, sentence 1 would need to be before sentence 3 as well.
I think A is the best concluding sentence
True. The whole purpose of a bandwagon is convincing people that everyone else has already jumped in. So therefore, most eveyone else would support the proposal, whatever it might be.
<span>1. The correct answer is C, because in A, there should be a comma after Europe, not a full stop. In B, the comma should be before the quotation marks, not after. In D, there should be a comma before Tim and the quotation marks. 2. The correct answer is D, because in A, there should be a comma after said, in B, no comma is needed after that, and in C, the full stop should be within the quote, not outside of it. 3. The correct answer is C, because in A, the exclamation mark should be within the quote, in B, there should be a question mark within the quote instead of a comma, and in D, there should be a comma after declared. 4. The correct answer is A, because in B, there are no quotation marks, in C, the beginning of the quote is not capitalized, and in D, there should be a comma after said. 5. The correct answer is D, because in A, there should be a comma after exclaimed, in B, there should be a comma after oh, and in C, there should be a comma after twice, and not a full stop.</span>
Answer:
A.
Explanation:
It's most clearly bibliographic because it's stating the title of a read.
Hope this helps <3
