I believe the answer is opium
Hmmmmmmmmmm let's see. have you tried bleach?
The first one.
Explanation:
In this first one, the author is pulling apart what the evidence means (analysing it).
In the 2nd, it is NOT analyzing a piece of evidence specifically, it's summarizes the point and says it's supported by the evidence. So, not analyzing.
In the 3rd, the author is applying it to the situation and explaining why it's important, which is different from analysis.
In the 4th, the author is offering an example as evidence, not analyzing a piece of evidence.
In the beginning of Act 2, Scene 3, the Friar is picking herbs and flowers from his garden and thinking about what each of them can do. He is pondering the fact that some things that come from nature can heal a person while others can harm or even kill people. Additionally, some herbs can do both heal and harm if used different ways.
False. A paradox is an impossible question, something that is self-contradicting.
