1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mars2501 [29]
3 years ago
14

1. How did the English Bill of Rights change government in England?

History
1 answer:
alina1380 [7]3 years ago
5 0
C. By elevating Parliament above the monarchy.

The English Bill of Rights changes the government in England, by elevating Parliament above the monarchy. The bill of right is an Act of the Parliament of England concerned with constitutional matters and certain basic civil rights. It was established in 1689, and it represent the beginning of constitutional monarchy, which is different from absolute monarchy for the fact that parliament is above monarchy.

---

A. By appealing to citizens’ anger at economic crisis and social unrest.

Mussolini and the Fascists rise to power by appealing to citizens’ anger at economic crisis and social unrest, leading up to the creation of a new government following the march on Rome, in which he with members of his party were acclaimed y the citizens.

---

3.

-[Russia privatized state-run industries and farms]

-[ Foreign investment and trade declined. ]

-[A new wealthy upper class emerged as others struggled.]

In Russia, the privatization of industries and farms led to a decline in foreign investment and trade in general. This led to the struggle of the majority of the population, while a new wealthy class emerged, with all the privileges associated with such a status. 

 ---

D. Preventing the spread of communism.

The principal justification that the U.S. officials give for sending troops to aid an unpopular government in Vietnam was that they were trying to prevent the spread of communism since it was the public opinion number one preoccupation in the epoch of cold war.

---

A. Father José Morelos. B. José de San Martín. C. Toussaint L’Ouverture.

E. Simón Bolívar. F. Father Miguel Hidalgo.

Leaders which led nationalist revolutions that freed much of South America from Spanish rule were Father José Morelos, José de San Martín, Toussaint L’Ouverture, Simón Bolívar, Father Miguel Hidalgo. Each of them played an important part in the movement of liberation of South America.

---

Obstacles to Arab-Israeli peace:

-[Ongoing violence by Hamas.]

-[Right of return for Palestinian refugees.]

-[Status of East Jerusalem.]

-[ Possession of disputed oil reserves.]

-[ Radical groups’ rejections of Israel’s right to exist. ]

When evaluating the obstacles to Arab-Israeli peace there are many factors to keep in mind: first of all, the ongoing violence by Hamas, the right of return for Palestinian refugees that Israel keeps denying, the status of East Jerusalem which is still unclear. Moreover, the possession of disputed oil reserves have also economic repercussion on the conflict, while surely one of the major obstacles is radical groups’ rejections of Israel’s right to exist.

---

B. Harsh reparations from World War I. C. Spread of the Great Depression.

Some events that helped draw people to support Adolf Hitler’s Nazi Party were the harsh reparations from World War I, which in conjunction with the spread of Great Depression made the people from Germany particularly receptive to the nazis party propaganda.

----

C. Ottoman leaders feared losing parts of the empire to ambitious neighbours.

One of the causes of the Armenian genocide was that  Ottoman leaders feared losing parts of the empire to ambitious neighbours. In fact, Armenian were trying to exploit connection to English and the French government in order to free themselves from the Ottoman Empire.

---

A. Trench warfare. C. Rapid-fire machine guns. D. Poison gas. E. Heavy naval combat.

There were so many technologies and conditions that made World War I a new kind of war: trench warfare was one of the most important since it changes completely the way in which war was made, then rapid-fire machine guns allowed armies to take a lot of casualties in a quick way, while  poison gas was also introduced as a new potential dangerous weapon, able to destroy armies and civilians alike. Heavy naval combat was also a new way in which war was made.

--- 

B. Defeat in the Falklands War weakened the military regime.

The event which enabled the formation of a democratic government in Argentina in 1983, was the defeat in the Falklands War, which weakened the military regime that was in power in 1983 in Argentina, following the Army revolution of 1976, led by Peron.

You might be interested in
Who (or what) was Roosevelt referring to when he said, the hand that held the dagger has struck it into France's back?
san4es73 [151]

Answer:

On June 10,1940 US president Franklin D Roosevelt gave his famous speech "Stab in the Back" at University of Virginia.

On the speech He mentioned that the hand that held the dagger has struck into it's neighbor's back. Here he referred Italy and Mussolini as the hand which held dagger and France was the neighbor.

Because on June 10,1940 Italy declared war against France and Britain and joined to Germany on axis power. Mussolini said Italy was joining war against France and Britain as for keeping promise to Germany.

Roosevelt mentioned this incident for in his speech as the hand held dagger has struck into France's back.

Moreover, in this speech, He made a proclamation about removing America's neutral position in war and soon declared the Mediterranean see as a combat zone.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
ASAP! HELP! MCQ!
Rus_ich [418]

Answer:

Marx believed that this class conflict would result in the overthrow of the bourgeoisie and that the private property would be communally owned. The mode of production would remain, but communal ownership would eliminate class conflict.

Hope this helped

6 0
3 years ago
Que tipo de texto es
Assoli18 [71]

What is this language... I don't know what this language is, pls use English for your questions next time.

3 0
3 years ago
In the Scott v. Sandford case, Sandford’s argument was based on
drek231 [11]
In the Scott v. Sandford case, Sandford's argument was based on the Missouri Compromise.
7 0
3 years ago
The descriptions in the last paragraph paint the boy as
Aneli [31]

write down the paragraph

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did Hammurabi establish fairness and rules for his people? He appointed judges to make decisions about right and wrong. He e
    5·2 answers
  • Why was the Japanese Internment a necessary war measure for the US during WWII?_
    9·1 answer
  • How are the executive departments connected to the cabinet?
    15·1 answer
  • Was obama a republican
    15·2 answers
  • The American general who was in charge of the U.S. Army’s occupation of Japan was
    5·1 answer
  • Name the pRead the quote from Jefferson Davis.
    14·2 answers
  • What was one effect of the bay of pigs invasion​
    5·1 answer
  • What was the Caste System and how did it prevent society from growing?
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a disadvantage of a federal system of government?
    8·1 answer
  • Name the 4 other locations the U.S. Military was sent during the 1990s?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!