I am completely sure that there should be an options to choose. Anyway, I think the answer is: Coupling describes the degree of interdependence among modules. It's a term which is commonly used in software development. This term means that every component in coupled architecture can be autonomous.
Other things being equal,foreign governments and corporations would demand <u>More</u> U.S.funds if their local interest rates were suddenly higher than U.S. rates.For a given foreign interest rate level,foreign demand for U.S. funds is <u>inversely </u>related to U.S.interest rates.
Answer: More;inversely
<u>Explanation:</u>
U.S. funds represent the funds that are available for borrowing and interest rates means cost of those borrowings.Other countries can buy U.S funds.There is inverse relationship between U.S. interest rates and foreign demand for U.S. funds.If U.S. interest rates are higher than a given foreign interest rate, than foreign governments will demand less of U.S funds because it will be costlier.But on the other hand if U.S.interest rates are less than a given foreign interest rate,than other countries will demand more of U.S. funds because it will be cheaper for them.
So demand curve for U.S funds and U.S interest rates is downward sloping.It has negative slope.
The amount of cost of goods sold using FIFO method is $110,000.
Hope this helps. :)
Answer:
a. The supplier has more bargaining power than the firm.
Explanation:
This is an example of one of Porters' five forces. The supplier has a monopoly and thus entertains a high market share. This means that the supplier has more bargaining power than the firm as if the firm wants the ceramic there are no alternative options available for the firm; however, if the firm does not want supplies, the supplier can find plenty of firms that may need the ceramic thus making supplier more powerful than the firm.
Hope that helps.
Answer:
The value of the firm according to M&M Proposition I with taxes is $513,824.62
Explanation:
Value of firm = [EBIT x (1-Tax) / Equity Cost] + [Debt x Tax rate]
Value of firm = 82000 x (1-24%) / 13% + 143500 x 24%
Value of firm = 62320 / 0.13 + 143500 x 0.24
Value of firm = 479,384.62 + 34,440
Value of firm = $513,824.62