<u>Answer:</u>
The name 'Pilgrims' as applied to Plymouth Separatists, was quoted by historians from William Bradford.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Though the name 'pilgrims' appeared in the recitation of Chandler Robbins for the first time in 1793, it was first used by historian William Bradford in a document drafted by him.
It was after William Bradford that many historians started to Plymouth Separatists by the name 'Pilgrims'. It was only by 1820, that the name 'Pilgrims' became common and the Plymouth Separatists started being called by that name all over.
Please be more specific, i cant help you with so little info
Answer and Explanation:
Janismo, Buddhism and Hinduism are ancient religions full of different and similar concepts that influence not only the spirituality of the people who adopt them, but also the personality and culture of that people.
Janismo had Mahavita as its founder. This religion was based on the domain of self-control, a characteristic very defended by its founder, who also defended that the followers of that religion should always promote the good to any living being he encountered and avoided at any cost to cause harm to any living being, that included avoid the sacrifice of animals, which was considered a type of torture.
Buddhism is a religion full of strands and very influential to this day. This religion preached that the human being should be freed from his desires, lead a simple life and cherish peace and harmony, avoiding violence and disorder. He also rejected the practice of sacrifices and claimed that salvation came from mental detachment.
Last but not least, Hinduism is also an influential religion today, with millions of followers. This religion accepted sacrifices and divided beings into castes that had different roles in society. Hinduism is a polytheistic religion that preaches the immortality of the relationship between gods and men.
It exposed the fact that the Articles of Confederation did not have much military power. Shay's Rebellion would not have been as terrible if the Articles simply summoned an army to stop it, but they did not because of their lack of authority. Instead, local militias had to step in and stop the rebellion. This would lead to the US Constitution being allowed to summon the military in the situation of combat.
