Answer:
The most suitable answer is Stocks may help you protect your money from inflation while bonds may be more susceptible to losing their value over time due to inflation.
Explanation:
Now remember, this is not "guaranteed" as stocks come with higher risks comparing to bonds, yet in US share market, stocks have performed well than the bonds overall. This is because stock prices fluctuate and if the company invested in is performing well, the share prices can sky rocket over a long period while in bonds you don't see this often as they are issued for a specific time and represents the debt capital.
Answer:
(a)70 years
(b)23.33 years
(c)8.75 years
Explanation:
According to the Rule of 70, for a given interest rate x, funds double in 
years.
(a)For a savings account earning 1% interest per year,
The number of years it will take the fund to double= 
=70 years
(b)For a U.S. Treasury bond mutual fund earning 3% interest per year.
The number of years it will take the fund to double= 
=23.33 years
(c)For a stock market mutual fund earning 8% interest per year.
The number of years it will take the fund to double= 
=8.75 years
4) paring 5) fish 6) utility 7) filet 8) chef 9) turning 10) bread
(might be wrong)
The organizing function of management is when a manager is responsible for organizing staff and making sure the staff members have the necessary resources to do their jobs. This is further explained below.
<h3>What is the Organizing function of
management?</h3>
Generally, In order to achieve goals, the role of management is to establish an organization's structure and allocate human resources.
In conclusion, Management's organizing role is to ensure that employees are properly organized and equipped to carry out their duties.
Read more about management
brainly.com/question/14523862
#SPJ1
The statement, 'lower interest rates are part of tight money policy' is false.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Tight monetary policy which is also known as contractionary monetary policy is undertaken by Federal Reserve to reduce the economic growth that is overheated and to curb fast increasing inflation rate. Here the policy increases the interest rates thereby reducing the borrowing in the economy.
So, the true statement would be 'lowering the interest rates stimulates the borrowing in the economy and it is a part of the expansionary or loose monetary policy'.
