1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
almond37 [142]
3 years ago
11

American​ Exploration, Inc., a natural gas​ producer, is trying to decide whether to revise its target capital structure. Curren

tly it targets a 50​-50 mix of debt and​ equity, but it is considering a target capital structure with 70​% debt. American Exploration currently has 6​% ​after-tax cost of debt and a 12​% cost of common stock. The company does not have any preferred stock outstanding.
a. What is American​ Exploration's current​ WACC?
b. Assuming that its cost of debt and equity remain​ unchanged, what will be American​ Exploration's WACC under the revised target capital​ structure?
c. Do you think shareholders are affected by the increase in debt to 70​%? If​ so, how are they​ affected? Are the common stock claims riskier​ now?
d. Suppose that in response to the increase in​ debt, American​ Exploration's shareholders increase their required return so that cost of common equity is 16​%. What will its new WACC be in this​ case?
e. What does your answer in part d suggest about the tradeoff between financing with debt versus​ equity?
Business
1 answer:
Marat540 [252]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

a) 9.00 %

b) 7.80 %

c) yes the weight of the debt increases here is more risk in the investment as the debt payment are mandatory and failing to do so result in bankruptcy while the stock can wait to receive dividends if the income statement are good enough

d) 9.00  %

e) The increase in debt may lñead to an increase in return of the stockholders if they consider the stock riskier than before and will raise their return until the WACC equalize at the initial point beforethe trade-off occurs

Explanation:

a)

WACC = K_e(\frac{E}{E+D}) + K_d(1-t)(\frac{D}{E+D})

Ke 0.12

Equity weight 0.5

Kd(1-t) = after tax cost of debt = 0.06

Debt Weight = 0.5

WACC = 0.12(0.5) + 0.06(0.5)

WACC 9.00000%

c)

WACC = K_e(\frac{E}{E+D}) + K_d(1-t)(\frac{D}{E+D})

Ke 0.12

Equity weight 0.3

Kd(1-t) = after tax cost of debt = 0.06

Debt Weight 0.7

WACC = 0.12(0.3) + 0.06(0.7)

WACC 7.80000%

d)

WACC = K_e(\frac{E}{E+D}) + K_d(1-t)(\frac{D}{E+D})

<em>Ke 0.16</em>

Equity weight 0.3

Kd(1-t) = after tax cost of debt = 0.06

Debt Weight 0.7

WACC = 0.16(0.3) + 0.06(0.7)

WACC 9.00000%

You might be interested in
Which of the following is a characteristic of economic services:
9966 [12]

Answer:

useful

Explanation:

i got it from USA test prep

4 0
3 years ago
Hurte-Paroxysm Products, Inc. (HP) of the United States exports computer printers to Brazil, whose currency, the reals (symbol R
Kaylis [27]

Answer:

Hurte-Paroxysm Products, Inc. (HP)

The short-run impact of each pricing strategy is as follows:

                                           Alternative 1                      Alternative 2

                             Reduce Price to $170     Maintain Price of $200

Gross profit                        $2,500,000               $3,200,000

Reduction in Gross Profit   $1,500,000                  $800,000

b. (2) maintain the same dollar price of $200, raise the real price in Brazil (to R$800 from R$680)to compensate for the devaluation, and experience a 20% drop in volume.

c. If HP maintains the same real price and same unit volume, the firm's gross profits will be $2,500,000.

Explanation:

a) Data and Calculations:

Exchange rate = R$3.40/US$

Current exports of printers per year to Brazil = 50,000

US unit price of printer in dollars = $200

Brazil unit price of printer in R$ equivalent = R$680 ($200 * R$3.40)

Unit price of printer in R$ when reals is devalued = R$800 ($200 * R$4.00)

The reduced dollar price with devaluation, when real price is maintained = $170 (R$680/R$4.00)

Before Devaluation of Brazil's Real (R$):

Sales volume            50,000

Sales revenue $10,000,000 (50,000 * $200)

Direct costs         6,000,000 (50,000 * $120)

Gross profit       $4,000,000

                              Alternative 1                  Alternative 2

                       Reduce Price to $170     Maintain Price at $200

Sales volume                50,000                      40,000 (50,000 * 80%)

Sales revenue      $8,500,000               $8,000,000 ($200 * 40,000)

Direct costs            6,000,000                  4,800,000 ($120 * 40,000)

Gross profit         $2,500,000                $3,200,000 ($80 * 40,000)

Direct costs = $6m ($120 * 50,000)        = $4.8m ($120 * 40,000)

8 0
3 years ago
Vertical disintegration occurs when a company: a. uses its capital resources to purchase its competitor. b. takes advantage of a
Marizza181 [45]

Answer:

b. takes advantage of another company it does business with after the other company has made a substantial investment in assets to meet the needs of the company.

Explanation:

Vertical disintegration occurs when a company takes advantage of another company it does business with after the other company has made a substantial investment in assets to meet the needs of the company.

A common or popular example of vertical disintegration is Hollywood because it comprises of specialized business firms that are saddled with the responsibility of performing specific tasks or services such as creating movie trailers, posters, editing, sound effects, special effects, lighting, etc.

Generally, vertical disintegration help business firms or organizations to share risk associated with doing business among themselves.

5 0
3 years ago
Overhead includes all except _____________________.
Irina-Kira [14]

Answer:

B) Rent

Have an excellent day!!!

8 0
3 years ago
Financial Statements of ABC Corp. indicates that ending inventory levels in 2005 and 2006 were $200,000 and $350,000 respectivel
ad-work [718]

Answer:

Cost of goods purchased= $2,350,000

Explanation:

Giving the following information:

Beginning inventory 2006= ending inventory 2005= $200,000

Ending inventory 2006= $350,000

COGS 2006= $2,200,000

<u>To calculate the purchases for 2006, we need to use the following formula:</u>

COGS= beginning finished inventory + cost of goods purchased - ending finished inventory

2,200,000 = 200,000 + cost of goods purchased - 350,000

2,200,000 - 200,000 + 350,000 = cost of goods purchased

cost of goods purchased= $2,350,000

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Recruiting new employees via the Internet allows companies to _________. a.Reach candidates from across the worldb.Conduct recru
    13·2 answers
  • Three years ago American Insulation Corporation issued 10%, $800,000, 10-year bonds for $770,000. American Insulation exercised
    13·1 answer
  • What is it called when banks record which account gives up money and which account receives money when a customer writes a check
    9·1 answer
  • Martin wants to provide money in his will for an annual bequest to whichever of his living relatives is oldest. That bequest wil
    11·1 answer
  • How does the book value of shares of stock differ from the market value of shares of stock? Use a real-world example in your ans
    7·1 answer
  • Investing $2,000,000 in TQM's Channel Support Systems initiative will at a minimum increase demand for your products 3.0% in thi
    9·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer.
    10·1 answer
  • The Sausage Hut is looking at a new sausage system with an installed cost of $187,400. This cost will be depreciated straight-li
    10·1 answer
  • External forces in the natural environment include A. the trend toward healthier lifestyles, which can shift spending toward exe
    11·1 answer
  • Major federal eeo laws have been enacted to prevent discrimination against groups of workers most often affected by unfair emplo
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!