1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ne4ueva [31]
2 years ago
5

Describe the many powers of ancient greece

History
1 answer:
GREYUIT [131]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

In the year 507 B.C., the Athenian leader Cleisthenes introduced a system of political reforms that he called demokratia, or “rule by the people” (from demos, “the people,” and kratos, or “power”). It was the first known democracy in the world.

You might be interested in
How did the fundamentalist revolt take place
sergey [27]

Answer: What was the fundamentalist revolt?

The protestants felt threatened by the decline of value and increase in visibility of Catholicism and Judaism. The Fundamentalists ended up launching a campaign to rid Protestant denominations of modernism and to combat the new individual freedoms that seemed to contradict traditional morals.

What caused fundamentalism?

The causes of Fundamentalism. Steve Bruce argues that the main causes of Fundamentalism are modernisation and secularisation, but we also need to consider the nature of the religions themselves and a range of 'external factors' to fully explain the growth of fundamentalist movements.

Fundamentalism, in the narrowest meaning of the term, was a movement that began in the late 19th- and early 20th-century within American Protestant circles to defend the "fundamentals of belief" against the corrosive effects of liberalism that had grown within the ranks of Protestantism itself. Liberalism, manifested in critical approaches to the Bible that relied on purely natural assumptions, or that framed Christianity as a purely natural or human phenomenon that could be explained scientifically, presented a challenge to traditional belief.

A multi-volume group of essays edited by Reuben Torrey, and published in 1910 under the title, The Fundamentals, was financed and distributed by Presbyterian laymen Lyman and Milton Stewart and was an attempt to arrest the drift of Protestant belief. Its influence was large and was the source of the labeling of conservatives as "fundamentalists."

Useful for looking at this history of fundamentalism are George Marsden's Fundamentalism and American Culture: The Shaping of Twentieth-Century Evangelicalism, 1870-1925 (New York: Oxford, 1980), Bruce B. Lawrence, Defenders of God: The Fundamentalist Revolt against the Modern Age (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1989), David Beale, In Pursuit of Purity: American Fundamentalism Since 1850 (Greenville: Unusual Publications, 1986), and Mark A. Noll, A History of Christianity in the United States and Canada (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1992).

Lately, the meaning of the word "fundamentalism" has expanded. This has happened in the press, in academia, and in ordinary language. It appears to be expanding to include any unquestioned adherence to fundamental principles or beliefs, and is often used in a pejorative sense. Nowadays we hear about not only Protestant evangelical fundamentalists, but Catholic fundamentalists, Mormon fundamentalists, Islamic fundamentalists, Hindu fundamentalists, Buddhist fundamentalists, and even atheist or secular or Darwinian fundamentalists.

Scholars of religion have perhaps indirectly contributed to this expansion of the term, as they have tried to look for similarities in ways of being religious that are common in various systems of belief. Between 1991 and 1995, religion scholars Martin Marty and Scott Appleby published a 5-volume collection of essays as part of "The Fundamentalism Project" at the University of Chicago, which is an example of this approach. Appleby is co-author of Strong Religion (2003), also from the University of Chicago Press that attempts to give a common explanatory framework for understanding anti-modern and anti-secular religious movements around the world.

7 0
3 years ago
Why did the Confederates burn Richmond as President Davis and his cabinet fled?
liubo4ka [24]

The Confederates burned Richmond as President Davis and his cabinet fled to make sure the Union Army could not use Confederate resources.

During the American Civil War, Richmond became the capital of the Confederate States of America.

On April 2, 1865, more than 25% of the buildings in the city were destroyed by fire after the withdrawal of the Confederate soldiers, who burned all the Confederate resources to make them unusable for the Union.

On April 3, 1865, Ulysses S. Grant and the Union Army captured Richmond, and the state capital was then transferred to Lynchburg. The Army of North Virginia, commanded by Robert Lee retired and surrendered six days later before Grant in the Appomattox Court House, becoming the symbolic end of the war.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The rise of (individualism) or (nationalism) encouraged people to study their nation's history (PLZZ HELP)
denpristay [2]

Answer: Historiography for the Purpose of Nationalism.

Explanation:

The emergence of nationalism in a world dating back to the late eighteenth century. Get your full swing in the next two. Nationalism is reflected through all pores of political, social and scientific life. The emergence of nationalism also reflected on historiography.

Many historians have been encouraged by nationalism. Many of these works have emerged as a result of these tendencies. It is often a syndrome of lesser value because myths characterize most of these historical works. Their scientific value is also called into question. The historian must be objective when writing. The question is, where does this phenomenon come from? Nationalism in historiography seeks to portray, one national entity as larger than another. That is, to minorize another. A patriot historian can be objective, unlike a nationalist.

6 0
3 years ago
Which is TRUE about the Equal Rights Amendment? *
posledela

Answer:

The answer would be B (It led to higher wages for working women) if it was successful.

However, it was not. So, the answer is A (It failed because not enough states ratified (passed) it.)

(Could I get Brainliest pls?)

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What us constitutional right did president lincoln suspend?
Sav [38]
~Hello there! ^_^

Your question: What US constitutional right did president Lincoln suspend..?

Your answer: President Lincoln suspended the rights of habeas corpus during the Civil War.

Happy Studying! :D





4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Political instability in Caribbean South America is most closely tied to?
    14·2 answers
  • Which country joined Poland to form a powerful federation?
    5·1 answer
  • Which action is an example of the unwritten Constitution
    7·2 answers
  • What was a key difference between the political and economic outlooks of Vladimir Lenin and Joseph Stalin?
    14·1 answer
  • The basis for the rights of U.S. citizens is the: Articles of Confederation Constitution Declaration of Independence Magna Carta
    14·2 answers
  • How did Napoleon Bonaparte invasion of Spain help the creoles in latin america
    8·1 answer
  • Definition for Harlem renaissance and Sacco-Vanzetti?
    12·1 answer
  • Can someone help me answer these questions
    15·1 answer
  • What was the main factors fueling the European age of expansion?
    7·1 answer
  • What began occurring in the united states in 1930? where in the united states did it begin?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!