Government spending accounts for a huge amount of the economy — some 40% or so in many modern economies. It’s not a matter of whether the government should try to influence the economy — it inevitably does. The question is in what ways it should try.
Also, it’s impossible to have a modern economy without a central bank and the central bank should be a government agency to keep it responsible to the nation as a whole, so monetary policy is inevitable as well.
2ND ANSWER IF THE 1ST ONE DOESNT WORK
Not even a little. Their motives are not pure and they can never have sufficient information or understanding.
Famous Hayek quote that needs mentioning in this sort of thread:
The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design. To the naive mind that can conceive of order only as the product of deliberate arrangement, it may seem absurd that in complex conditions order, and adaptation to the unknown, can be achieved more effectively by decentralizing decisions and that a division of authority will actually extend the possibility of overall order. Yet that decentralization actually leads to more information being taken into account.
The Fatal Conceit : The Errors of Socialism (1988), p. 76
I would make an exception for prizes for innovation. They will probably be gamed, but they’ll keep the pols busy and might produce something useful.
I believe the answer is: The advocates’ actions are moral because sometimes there are duties and moral laws higher than those prescribed by civil law.
Civil law tend to created based on what is generally accepted by people at the time it's created. Because of this, many civil laws that is made in the past might be seen as unjust in society today. For example, the civil laws in the past only give the right to vote in the election to Men.
Well, that's an interesting question. It was not religious at the time: Michelangelo and patrons were Christian, and cupids were not part of any religion actually practiced for a long time back then.
Originally, however, cupid was the Roman/Greek god of desire or love. So the artwork refers to an originally religious concept, but was not religious at the time.
Answer:
Suggestibility
Explanation:
In psychology, the term suggestibility refers to the process by which we accept and act under the suggestions of others. When we're talking about memory, this phenomenon happens when <u>we fill gaps in our memory with information that other persons give to us (by remembering an event).</u>
In this example, a fake crime was committed and a man with brown hair and blue jeans and green long-sleeved shirt stole a woman's handbag. Later, many "witnesses" (some of them were staged) said that the man was wearing a hat, so later when they were questioned by the police, many witnesses actually said that the man was wearing a hat. We can see <u>how the influence of the other people (the staged "witnesses") made the normal witnesses fill the gap in their memory with the information that this fake witnesses gave to them ("The man was wearing a hat")</u> and therefore, this explains suggestibility.
African american soldiers became free men
