1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dmitry [639]
2 years ago
10

What was a result of the Whiskey Rebellion? A: The government agreed to immediately remove the tax on whiskey. B: The federal go

vernment asserted its authority. C: Farmers overthrew the state government in Pennsylvania. D: Washington gave up his role of commander in chief.
History
2 answers:
Maru [420]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

B

Explanation:

why would you give the other person brainliest and rate them five stars if they were wrong

torisob [31]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

I would say it would most likely be A.

Explanation: Hope this helps pls leave a like and rating I appreciate it all ; )

You might be interested in
Was the united state correct 1945 when it became the first nation to use atomic weapons against japan to end world war 2 or was
Dominik [7]

Answer:

It was a morally wrong decision to drop the atomic bombs.

Explanation:

This is a heavily debated opinion-based question where you can go both ways. In my personal opinion, I personally argue that it was morally wrong for the US to use atomic weapons on Japan. Below is my reasoning.

1. Japan had already expressed the desire to surrender previous to the dropping of the atomic bombs, meaning that they were not a military necessity.

Prior to the dropping of the atomic bombs, Japan had already expressed the desire to surrender under the single condition that their emperor would not be harmed. (This was mainly due to cultural reasons that made the emperor a particularly important figure) Instead of accepting, the United States instead decided to fight for unconditional surrender. While they did achieve that in the end, they ended up not harming the emperor anyway, meaning that they could have just accepted Japan's surrender in my personal opinion. Moreover, this desire disproves the argument that the decision to drop the bomb was a military necessity and many contribute Japan's surrender more so to the Soviet invasion of Manchuria which meant Japan now had to fight a two-front war.

2. Atomic weapons are a form of indiscriminite killing.

Atomic weapons don't have eyes. They can't tell the difference between the military and civilians. Thousands of women and children were killed that had no involvement in the war. It is a war crime to intentionally target civilians, so why would atomic weapons be ethically acceptable? While the US did drop leaflets to warn civilians prior to the attacks, this act is not enough, and it cannot be expected for millions to flee thier homes.

3. The government may have been considering diplomatic reasons rather than solely ending the war.

If the US was really after a speedy end to the end of the war, there could have been many other ways to go about it. They could have continued to firebomb cities or accept conditional surrender. Some have argued that the diplomatic effects that came with it such as scaring the Soviets and proving US dominance were also in policymakers' minds. If the US had not been victorious in World War II, several important members of the government would have likely been tried as war criminals.

The Counter Argument:

Of course, there is also a qualified opposing view when it comes to this. It is perfectly valid to argue that the bomb was necessary for ending the war: as it is impossible to know the "what ifs" had history not happened the way it did. It is undeniable that the atomic bomb likely saved thousands of American lives if the war would have continued, and the war did ultimately come to an end a couple of days after the atomic bombs. There also is not enough evidence as to what exactly was the reason the Japanese unconditionally surrendered: it could have been Manchuria or the atomic bomb, both, or even other reasons entirely. Lastly, the general public did approve of the bombings at the time.

In recent years, the public have slowly become more critical of the bombings, although it remains a weighted moral debate.

Note: These are my personal views and this does explicitly represent the views of anyone else. Please let me know if you have any questions :)

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement would most likely be made by a supporter of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan
alexgriva [62]
The answer is B , It is the job of the United States to protect the world from terrorism.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
under john marshall's term on the Supreme court, what three princies were established that expanded federal power?
forsale [732]

Answer:

In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that the constitution is the supreme law of the land and that the courts have the power of judicial review. Another principle established by John Marshall was that a loose view of the constitution is legal.

4 0
3 years ago
During the Heian period, what was the role of nobility in the development of Japanese society? to eliminate feudalism to promote
m_a_m_a [10]

Answer: To raise cultural standard

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Explain why the southern colonies developed an economic system that relied on slavery​
Serggg [28]

Answer:

England's southern colonies in North America developed a farm economy that could not survive without slave labor. Many slaves lived on large farms called plantations. These plantations produced important crops traded by the colony, crops such as cotton and tobacco.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Do you think that island hopping was a good strategy used by japan? What made it difficult? (Ww2)
    6·1 answer
  • What was the challenge that the Framers faced when setting out to write the Constitution, and how did they meet it?
    7·1 answer
  • Who was removed as general of the Union army for ordering his men to charge across an open field while being attacked by Confede
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements explains why nativism increased after World War I
    5·1 answer
  • What is the social structure of Sumer?
    5·2 answers
  • The map depicts areas under Allied and Axis control.
    12·1 answer
  • 1. Why
    7·2 answers
  • PLS HELP!!
    15·2 answers
  • Help Mach the things
    15·2 answers
  • Read this excerpt from The Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass.
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!