Answer:
<u>d)federalists and centralist
</u>
Explanation:
The post-independence period of Mexican history was very turbulent and volatile, both politically and economically. In 1833, Valentin Gomez Farias carried out more liberal reforms, which sparked a revolt in conservative circles that led to the dissolution of the first federal republic and the creation of the first centralist republic.
General Antonio Lopez de Santa Ana proclaimed in 1835 the so-called Seven laws, thus provoking separatist reactions in multiple departments. Separatist uprisings were largely stifled except in Texas, which declared its independence in 1836 and was subsequently annexed by the United States. In 1841, Yucatan also declared its independence. It was not until 1848 that he again became part of the Mexican state.
Answer:
vocabulary words that are specific to a certain academic subject
Explanation:
They traded stuff that they can easily make or plant for stuff they can't plant or make
In this milestone decision, the Supreme Court ruled that separating children in public schools on the basis of race was unconstitutional. ... On May 17, 1954, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Earl Warren delivered the unanimous ruling in the landmark civil rights case Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas.
Answer: A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss aversion will provide additional motivation
.
Options:
A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss
aversion will provide additional motivation
B. designating a charity should be more effective because it avoids all potential for loss
C. it shouldn’t matter whether one designates a charity or anti-charity
D. self-interest biases generally keep people from choosing the anti-charity
Explanation:
The study of behavioral Economics shows that people are more driven by the loss of fear than the hope of gain. This is known as loss aversion. In commitment contracts where penalty money is promised to a charity or an anti-charity if the goal is not achieved, those who promise their money to an anti-charity tend to achieve their goals more. The same also applies when comparing this group and those who do not have to forego anything if they do not meet their target.
This is because giving to a charity will still seem beneficial while losing the money to an anti-charity will seem like a total loss.
