Answer:
1.Christopher Columbus was a fraud.2. He was indeed a brave and prolific explorer. 3.but he also was a brutal evil man who never even made it to the place that is now the United States.4. We all believe that Columbus is a villain than a hero.
5.First of all, according to Wikipedia, A hero (masculine) or heroine (feminine) is a person or main character of a literary work who, in the face of danger, combats adversity through feats of ingenuity, bravery or strength, often sacrificing their own personal concerns for a greater good. However, based on what we have learned about Christopher Columbus, what he did has nothing to do with the definition of hero. His motivation to take the travel was to arrive in India, a country in east Asia, to obtain gold. From this perspective, his motivation was not noble. In addition, he did not arrive in India.
Secondly, he set a bad example to colonists came later. According to the article “Christopher Columbus: Hero or Murderer?” by Whitney DeWitt, it is said that “Columbus’s arrogance and exploitation regarding slavery began on his second voyage. Ferdinand and Isabella had ordered that the natives be treated kindly. In opposition to this order, Columbus began exporting slaves in great numbers in 1494.” His way to treat the native residents was improper and rude, which is bad model to colonists who came later. A hero is supposed to be a decent man who get rid of bad reputation. Columbus’ behavior did not conform to the standard.
Because of the reasons given above, it will be hard to classify Christopher Columbus as a hero. His motivation to come to American continent was not noble. He set a bad example to colonists who came later. In addition, his arrival caused a catastrophe to local residents. Therefore, he is more like a villain than a hero.
brainliest plz
Answer:
C. Only white families could afford to buy a house in the suburbs.
Explanation:
A is incorrect because it technically did not ever place a "ban" on specific races being able to move into suburbs, all it did was segregate whites and blacks in schools, public places, etc.
B is incorrect because minority groups were often discriminated against pay wise and job eligibility wise, so it would not make sense that they would be the only ones that could afford housing in suburbs.
C is correct because white families were the only "group" that could afford the housing because they were least discriminated against in a work environment back in the 1960s.
D is incorrect because it just doesn't make sense, I do not believe the government has any housing financial aid in the 1960s in general.
Hopefully this helps!
Answer:
Improved Cash Flow
Explanation:
On its own, a loan will improve your cash flow by giving you access to more capital. That benefit is compounded when your monthly payments are lower due to a longer loan term. By extending the length of the loan, therefore lowering your monthly payments, you have more money available each month
The primary constitutional restrictions on the power of the states to set voting qualifications is that states cannot prevent or impeded anyone from voting based on their race, gender, creed, or religion.
Answer: It is either C or D but it's probably C
Explanation: Based on common sense and kinda off what google says
