The Indian removal in the 19th century did not imply the end of the civilization project.
The foundation of the first settlements in North America implied the beginning of conflicts between English settlers and native tribes. Due to this, from the beginning, there was an implicit project of integrating native Americans into the "civilized" society.
This project implied a set of actions including:
Buying the territories of these native tribes.
Negotiating with them.
Forcing them to integrate into society.
Among others.
One of the most criticized actions was the Indian removal that meant thousands of Native Americans were forced to leave their territories. This action was one of just many others so even after this the project of making native people civilized continued.
Yes, I agree that Indian removal from their lands leads to the end of United States' "civilization project".
I agree that the Indian removal in the 19th century marked the end of the United States' "civilization project" because the displacement of Indians from their original regions and used that land for the settlement of Americans leads to the ending of America's civilization.
American Indians were the real owners and inhabitants of United states of America and they had a unique civilization and traditions so we can conclude that Indian removal from their lands leads to the end of United States' "civilization project".
The Sugar Boycott was led by members of the Quaker faith, including important female voices such as Elizabeth Heyrick from Leicester who recognised the ways in which the sugar trade was helping to support the slave trade.
