A government that gives all key powers to the national or central government. A government that divides the powers of government <u>between the national government and state or provincial governments</u>. A plan that provides the rules for government.
I’ll give you two:
Yes: The “War” on the Indians was not a traditional war of declaration but of skirmishes. When wagon trains of people headed West Indians would commonly target them for raids and pillage, so along many routes forts where built and patrols would try and make sure they were safe. If the problem became worse the local garrison would find the tribe and come with a list of demands. Most of the time they were fired upon arrival out of fear or anger. This would lead to a small battle or skirmish which would likely cause collateral damage.
No: The wars raged in the west against the Indians were that of near genocide, and to call it anything but is misleading. To claim that the slaughter of hundreds of innocent people was a “battle” is absurd and shouldn’t be considered. Though in films that depict such events are dramatized and inaccurate, situations much like those were taking place around the west yearly.
Two of the most important French settlements in Africa were French Sudan and Niger, since these were located in West Africa and provided ample trading opportunities.
The correct answer is - The God Huitzilopotchli desired more blood from human sacrifice.
The Aztecs were very fond of performing sacrifices towards their Gods, especially to the God of war, Huitzilopotchli. They were making human sacrifices on a regular basis for him as he was a God that was very blood thirsty. Most of the people that were sacrificed were people from the other tribes that they were ruling over, but also there were lots of Aztecs that were sacrificed. While the other people did not wanted to be sacrificed, the Aztecs considered it as an honor to be sacrificed to their God, so lots of them were volunteering for sacrifice.