Viewers in 1986 were obsessed with sitcoms and this is a gradual shift from network TV’s monolithic dominance to infinite splinters of now.
<h3>How to explain the TV shows?</h3>
The current television landscape is different from what existed before. It feels antiquated to call content that wasn’t made for a traditional television channel “TV shows.”
The Cosby Show reigns supreme with about 61.4 million people tuning in each week. The viewers in 1986 were obsessed with sitcoms as the top 10 is otherwise filled with them.
By the late-1990s, most of the top 10 has viewership hovering in the 20 million. In 1999, the top 10 is suddenly dominated by hour-long dramas like The West Wing, The Sopranos, etc.
In 2019, where the top 10 include shows from Netflix, The Walking Dead, etc. The highest-rated show on TV was NCIS and it had half the viewers The Cosby Show did in 1986.
Learn more about television on:
brainly.com/question/871526
#SPJ1
Globalization must be expected to influence the distribution of income as well as its level. So far as the distribution of income between countries is concerned, standard theory would lead one to expect that all countries will benefit. Economists have long preached that trade is mutually beneficial, and most of us believe that the experience of widespread growth alongside rapidly growing trade in the postwar period serves to substantiate that. Similarly most FDI goes where a multinational has intellectual capital that can contribute something to the local economy, and is therefore likely to be mutually beneficial to investor and recipient. And a flow of capital that finances a real investment is again likely to benefit both parties, since the yield on the investment is expected to be higher than the rate of interest the borrower has to pay, while that rate of interest is also likely to be higher than the lender could expect at home since otherwise there would have been no incentive to send it abroad. Loose talk about free trade making the rich countries richer and poor countries poorer finds no support in economic analysis.
In the US government, citizens play a key role in elections
3) moving a settlement to a location that is closer to a river and which has copper deposits
