The one reason why sharecropping began in the South is option A which is It a way to take advantage of the South's strong infrastructure.
<h3>What is
sharecropping?</h3>
Sharecropping can be described as a system which allows the landlord/planter to help the a tenant to use the land in exchange for a share of the crop.
Therefore, The one reason why sharecropping began in the South is a way to take advantage of the South's strong infrastructure.
Learn more about sharecropping on:
brainly.com/question/13739356
#SPJ1
Answer:
The correct answer is Hernando de Soto. He was a Spanish explorer. He was on an exploration trip to find gold.
Explanation:
Hernando de Soto was a Spanish explorer who found the gold treasures but stumbled upon Mississippi. Initially he was searching for gold and other treasures but found Mississippi river instead. His huge search parties could not find the gold but found pearls instead.
Hernando de Soto was a greedy man. He kidnapped the Indians and made them his guides. Later, when the Indians had the opportunity, they attacked him and his search party rushing them away from their land.
Answer:
The British influence has changed the way we look at ourselves and has stripped us of a confidence that comes naturally to a people belonging to an ancient and great civilisation
Answer: in the text
Explanation:On Oct. 13, 1943, one month after Italy surrendered to Allied forces, it declared war on Nazi Germany, its onetime Axis powers partner. Italy was led into the war by Benito Mussolini, the fascist prime minister who had formed an alliance with Nazi Germany in 1936.
Answer: the representation of states in Congress.
<em>The Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise both focused on </em><em>the representation of states in Congress.</em>
Both of these compromises were devised during the United States Constitutional Convention in 1787. The Great Compromise resolved a dispute between small population states and large population states. The large population states wanted representation in Congress to be based on a state's population size. The smaller states feared this would lead to unchecked dominance by the big states; they wanted all states to receive the same amount of representation. The Great Compromise created a bicameral (two-chamber) legislature. Representation in the House of Representatives would be based on population. In the Senate, all states would have the same amount of representation, by two Senators.
The Three-Fifths Compromise was a way of accounting (somewhat) for the population of slaves in states that permitted slavery. For taxation and representation purposes, the question was whether slaves should count in the population figures. (They were not considered voting citizens at that time.) The Three-Fifths Compromise said that three out of every five slaves could be counted when determining a state's population size for determining how many seats that state would receive in the House of Representatives.
