1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Annette [7]
2 years ago
8

Which was the response of the British government after the event described above?

History
1 answer:
Vera_Pavlovna [14]2 years ago
4 0

Answer: The anwser is the last one on the bottom about intolabable acts

Explanation: The british were really mad that we dressed up as indians and there away there tea in the sea , so they decided to punish us by makeing the intorable acts. That basically made it so we couldnt trade with other countries and making higher taxes. This made civilain life a living hell

You might be interested in
Which of the following actions was Mussolini's Italy responsible for? A. the invasion of Ethiopia B. the annexation of Sudetenla
chubhunter [2.5K]
A, I am Ethiopian and I have done research about the invasion and the leader of the invasion was mussolini 
5 0
3 years ago
why are the decisions in miranda v. Arizona, Gideon v. Wainwright, and mapp v. Ohio stilwhyl very important to defendants in cri
Hunter-Best [27]

Answer:

The decisions in Miranda v. Arizona, Gideon v. Wainwright, and Mapp v. Ohio are very important to defendants in criminal proceedings today because they enlarged defendants' rights in criminal trials and investigations.

Thus, Miranda v. Arizona refers to the fact that those accused of a crime must know their rights prior to being questioned by the police, that is, that everything they say can be used against them and that they have the right to consult a lawyer.

For its part, Gideon v. Wainwright guaranteed the defendants the right to have a lawyer, even when they could not afford it on their own financial means. In this way, a defendant is not left legally unprotected for not being able to afford a lawyer, since it is the state that grants him one for free.

Finally, Mapp v. Ohio prohibits the use of illegitimately obtained evidence in criminal proceedings. Thus, non-compliance with the Fourth Amendment (and the consequent search without a warrant) renders the evidence obtained in this way not admissible in court.

8 0
3 years ago
After the Brown ruling, civil rights lawyers challenged segregation of
UNO [17]
A volunteer organizations
8 0
3 years ago
why did Hamilton believe that wealthy Americans were necessary to secure the nations econmic future?
sattari [20]
The better the people live the better the next genration is
3 0
3 years ago
Should migration be free throughout the world
kap26 [50]

Answer:

Yeah i think that it should be

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How are the American and French revolutions different? name one political and one economic reason
    10·1 answer
  • What event officially started the French Revolution?
    5·1 answer
  • African slavery began in the Americas in the 1500s when____________________ began bringing Africans to their colonies in the New
    11·2 answers
  • Which European power colonized India
    9·1 answer
  • Ideally how does a republics work
    15·1 answer
  • The signers of the peace treaty supported the creation of the League of Nations. What happened that prevented the United States
    14·2 answers
  • Why were westerners so determined to colonize southeast asia
    11·1 answer
  • Wny are House reps more responsive to the public than senators?
    6·1 answer
  • Which statement best explains why Texas seceded from the Union in 1861?
    5·1 answer
  • Who was the primary writer of the declaration of independence?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!