Answer:
pretty long question you got there
Answer:
James Monroe
Explanation:
5 stars plz and thank you
The fact that we fear things that are actually harmful has been proposed as an evolutionary explanation for <u>Phobias</u>
<u></u>
<h3>What is the evolutionary reason for fear?</h3>
The fear is a natural instinct built into living organisms that helps us avoid danger. Even some plants are afraid. In animals (including humans), instinct is in our hearts. Fear varies from person to person.
The opposite of fear is courage and courage is the ability to take risks. Unlike fear, courage is not a natural instinct but is developed or determined by us. While fear protects us from danger, courage can do the same.
Sometimes not all situations or dangers should be avoided, running away can make things worse. We need courage to get through it. Too much courage can also do us more harm than good. Fear is natural, but it is a bold decision.
So always consider the situation at hand and choose what to do, face it or run away. One word for the wise is enough.
To learn more about fears from given link
brainly.com/question/11649928
#SPJ4
The statement that best describe what is meant by limited government is :
C. there are things the government is not allowed to do
this will give more freedom to the people and the market
hope this helps
Answer:
He is in the third stage (interpersonal accord) of Kohlberg's stages of moral development.
Explanation:
Kohlberg did some studies on morality and proposed a theory on moral development. He defined three different levels of morality (and each level consists in 2 stages).
These levels are:
In the preconventional level, the person's morality is externally controlled and therefore acts based on what the punishment will be (1st stage) or based on how good will it be for him/her to act in some way (2nd stage)
The conventional level stages also have to to with external controls but now the person thinks in function of ensure positive relationships and societal order. The third stage here depends on the approval of others. The fourth stage has to do with accepting rules because they preserve the society order and functioning.
The postconventional level stages are defined in more abstract principles or values. The 5th stage sees the world as a place with different values that must be respected. Finally the 6th stage is based in universal ethical abstract principles.
In this example, Jason doesn't feel comfortable taking a decision without involving the chairman of the board. He is deciding to put aside his own interests for doing things the right way in the eyes of the shareholders, therefore, since he is focused in <u>external factors</u> he is in the <u>conventional level, specifically in the third stage in which decisions depend on the approval of others. </u>
