The conditions being so bad? i might be wrong
The position that the strict constructionists take in the
early years under the constitution is that the congress had the power of which
only listed in the article 2, section 8, and clause 1-17. Whereas the liberal constructionists
would have their congress to stench their power with the use of the elastic
clause, known as clause 18.
Answer:
I think its Athenian and Spartan army
The statement which best articulates a non interventionist argument against American imperialism is ''American expansion exploits the people’s of other nations''
Answer: Option B
<u>Explanation:</u>
The American rule over the other countries through ways like trade, religion or may be with the use of military forces was not liked by the people of those countries because it led to the deterioration of those economies and the exploitation of people of those countries.
Therefore people of those countries did not like it because it led to the exploitation of their resources, economy, financially and there was too much interference in the working of the government of those countries also.
Answer:
- During Washington presidency, the furs political parties were <u>formed</u><u> </u><u>in</u><u> </u><u>the</u><u> </u><u>United</u><u> </u><u>States</u><u>.</u>
- Conflict with foriegn power in the early years of the United States would lead to war with <u>Great</u><u> </u><u>Britain</u><u> </u>
- During the early 1800s, Us territory <u>E</u><u>xpanded</u>
<u>MARK</u><u> </u><u>BRAINLIEST</u><u> </u>