Answer:
This is part of the lecture of the 14th Dalai Lama, the religious and political leader of the Tibetan people, Tenzin Gyatso, he won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1989.
Explanation:
In his lecture he explains why Tibetans are happy and jovial people. It is about his cultural and religious values that stress the importance of mental peace through the generation of love and kindness to all other living sentient beings, both human and animal, but the key is really the inner peace, in that state of mind you can deal with situations with calmness and reason, while keeping your inner happiness. Without this inner peace you will be worried, disturbed or unhappy even if you have all the material things. Besides that, when we feel love and kindness towards others, it is not just good for them to feel loved, but it helps us also to develop inner happiness and peace.
I believe it is a run-on sentence but i am not certain
Answer:
The potential advantages explored in the text, regarding equipping machines with a sense of morality are that they can be an asset to humans by being able to complete tasks and make wise, split-second life and death decisions; such as, when not to clear buildings with civilians in them during war situations. Paragraph 8 states that Ronald Arkin, a computer science professor and robotics expert at Georgia Tech, has been developing software, referred to as an “ethical governor”, which would make machines capable of deciding when it’s appropriate to fire and when it’s not. Another advantage, as stated in Paragraph 9, is that machines will not be vulnerable to the emotional trauma of combat or to the desire for revenge. It will be free of emotions and emotional ties to other individuals and/or machines.
The potential disadvantages explored in the text, regarding equipping machines with a sense of morality are that they could be a serious threat to human safety; especially since their moral compass will be based on that of a human’s. That, within itself, leaves a lot to be desired. In Paragraph 19, it states that human ethics are a work-in-progress, and we still confront situations for which we don’t have well-developed codes. The text also mentioned in Paragraph 9 that machines could evolve and get rid of us.
Explanation:
