Being made president the three cuts i would mare would be in the following areas, taxes, Government spending and cut unnecessary ministries or departments.
The fist big cut I would make would be tax cuts, the reason for this is the less taxes are charged on the populaiton the more money said population will have to spend on goods and services adn thus circulate in the economy. This would also mean less tax breaks for the wealthly, thus removing their privileges of avoiding taxes through charities.
The second big cut I would make would be in government spending, or more specifically reducing or cutting the salaries of career politicians by 30% to 40%. This is becasue the government with is the largest spender of capital in any given country while being the lowest producer of capital and it is unsustainable to maintain large political salaries. With this cut it would not only alleviate the tax payer, but also free up remaining funds for health and educaiton.
Finally the last cuts I would make would be in the area of departments or ministries. While some such as the department of Agriculture and Interior incompatible and cannot be fused, other such as the departmetn of labour and Treasury can be fused, reducing the number of departments and thus overall government spending again.
These are the three be cuts I would make as President.
That there are three dimensions of inequality.
(Property/SES, Prestige, Power)
Answer:
A legal process
Explanation:
Adjudication is the legal procedure of settling disputes between employee and the employer in Michigan. There are unemployment insurance that runs weekly. The unemployed files for it and the Labor department verifies the track record of such unemployed to ascertain the nature and reason for leaving last appointment. It is then brought before the adjudication hearing to listen to explanations for reasons or clarify conflicting issues. It can be pending when there are reviews and checks to be done on claims made by the applicant to the State labor department and these claims are reviewed by the Adjudicator.
Answer:
Gender equality is where you have the same rights, benefits, and opportunities reguarless of your gender. Meaning you can't be suppressed and oppressed due to what you identify as.
