<u>The case of Texas vs. Johnson:</u>
In 1984 in the month of august the case started in Dallas. When the party gathered to nominate Press. Ronald Reagan as their candidate in that year’s presidential election.
Gregory Lee Johnson was a part of a group that had gathered to protest Reagan’s campaign, doused an American flag with kerosene and put it on fire in front of the Dallas City Hall.
He was then arrested for violating Texas’s state law that prohibited desecration of the U.S. flag and eventually was convicted as well; he was fined for what he had done and sentenced to one year in jail.
Although his conviction subsequently was overturned by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. It is the state’s highest appeals court for criminal cases. It stated that symbolic speech was protected by the First Amendment.
Answer:
I think that the constitution should be interpreted in an elastic manner. I think this because times are constantly changing and modernizing- cars change, phones change, society changes. With the constant forward movement in the way that we live, the constitution must be amended or at least looked at through a more modern point of view. Very little things have stayed the same since the constitution was created, except for the constitution itself. This founding document and the perspectives of it must change as we change for a freer culture and a brighter future.
Explanation:
Three-fifths compromise, compromise agreement between delegates from the Northern and the Southern states at the United States Constitutional Convention (1787) that three-fifths of the slave population would be counted for determining direct taxation and representation in the House of Representatives
Answer:
Kristallnacht was the night of broken glass. Answer A.
